Search for: "Case v. People"
Results 6221 - 6240
of 52,001
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2018, 10:45 am
People v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 11:55 am
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 9:35 am
The Court of Appeals decision in People v Suarez, 6 NY2d 202 [2005] continues to affect murder convictions in the Appellate Divisions. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court decided Burrage v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 9:00 am
See Strickland v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 12:11 pm
”Chief Justice John Roberts first raised the issue when he asked whether the administration considered anything “special about the fact that the people involved in this case are part of a religious organization. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 7:09 am
Case citation: O’Handley v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 5:30 am
Leckler v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 10:21 am
What many people don't realize is that by signing these documents, they may be signing away the right to have their case heard before a judge or jury. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 4:36 am
He said:"Patents are meant to teach people how to do things. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:31 am
In 2008’s Doe v. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 4:55 am
This too is odd because in many domestic violence cases, people take out their phones and show it to the judge as evidence. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 6:46 am
The federal court upheld the jury's findings on liability and damages.The case is Tranchina v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 11:50 am
Lewis (which was consolidated with two other cases, Ernst & Young LLP v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
One such setting is raised by an interesting and important case, Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 7:18 am
People v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 am
Supreme Court in Dobbs v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 8:05 pm
Mitchell v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 11:18 am
Supreme Court is set to hear the case of Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 3:26 am
Whatever the Government’s plans, in the immediate term employment tribunals are likely to feel the strain of an increase in cases brought before them; nonetheless, commentators expect a steady rise rather than a deluge. [read post]
