Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 6221 - 6240
of 15,521
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2016, 12:08 am
The IPKat is delighted to host a guest contribution by Simon Chapman (Lewis Silkin) on this very topic and on a case (Jack Wills v House of Fraser) in which he and his team have acted for the defendant.Here's what Simon writes:"Following Mr Justice Arnold’s finding (Jack Wills Limited v House of Fraser (Stores) Limited [2014] EWHC 110 (Ch)) that retailer House of Fraser was liable for trade mark infringement and passing off after adopting a… [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 7:37 am
TripAdvisor and Yelp v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 11:51 am
., Gugliuzza v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 2:35 am
The Courts have since added that the conduct must be ‘oppressive and unreasonable’ (Thomas v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1233). [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 12:39 pm
NSA and Smith v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
On this particular question, the Chief Justice’s judgement in Grant v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 8:25 am
The Google v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 7:49 am
An excellent example of this phenomenon is the Second Circuit’s recent decision in Halo v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 7:49 pm
The trial was portrayed in The People v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 3:05 pm
There is a lot to figure out. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:45 am
As a result of the decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:03 pm
The trouble for Ealing, who introduced the scheme after a 6 month pilot for which they couldn’t find the end figures, was that their own figures seemed to show something else. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:41 am
In so doing, we overrule the contrary holdings of State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 9:10 am
Duran v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 8:31 am
Sport Dimension, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:24 am
Go figure. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm
” Finally, in King v. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 5:10 pm
TLOC Senior Living, LLC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 11:26 am
R.A.V. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm
IN THE NEWS The Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in U.S. v. [read post]
