Search for: "JOHN DOES 1 -10" Results 6221 - 6240 of 9,149
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2011, 2:18 pm by Lovechilde
It radically cuts other government spending, the kind that does create jobs. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
That’s not anomalous, but does represent a community conflict. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:08 am by Walter Olson
” [western Maryland, same] As lawmakers seek budget cuts, school finance litigators are on the march to counter their plans [WSJ Law Blog] Wouldn’t waive regs: “U.S. blocks $1 million Italian supercar” [CNN Money] You see, entrepreneurial suit-filing does create jobs: “Hike in Wage-and-Hour Litigation Spurs Demand for Calif. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 2:55 am by JB
In the next sections of this blog post, I explain (1) why his historical arguments are anything but clear, and indeed, on occasion, somewhat suspect; and (2) why many of his claims are beside the point, because they are based on views about constitutional interpretation that I do not hold. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:16 pm by WIMS
 The report includes recommendations in four key areas: 1. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
What work does incentive theory do here? [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 8:46 am by Matthew Lister
John Simmons, but he plausibly argues that such an account leads us to “the edge of anarchy“. (2) Despite what is sometimes suggested, this clearly does not apply to Rawls himself. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 8:29 am by Jonathan Bailey
The lawsuits, which find copyright holders filing suit agianst thousands of “John Doe” defendants in a bid to force ISPs to turn over subscriber information, primarily exist to send “settlement letters” that have the defendant end the case for a few thousand dollars and not go through the cost of a trial and risk a larger judgement. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 7:28 pm
In this case, that something was a Superior Court judge's ruling that a man (known only as “John Doe” in court pleadings,) who had been previously convicted of a sex offense and classified by SORB as a Level 3 offender, was no longer a sexually dangerous person. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 7:28 pm
In this case, that something was a Superior Court judge's ruling that a man (known only as “John Doe” in court pleadings,) who had been previously convicted of a sex offense and classified by SORB as a Level 3 offender, was no longer a sexually dangerous person. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 10:41 am by Buce
Even trying to remain above the fray, as Obama often does, infuriates those who want a fighter. [read post]