Search for: "John Doe V"
Results 6221 - 6240
of 14,825
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2016, 8:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 7:12 am
Texas, may today be finding some solace in Mathis v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 4:36 am
To Fee or Not to Fee: Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons — I have a post at CaseText discussing last week’s Supreme Court decision in Kirtsaeng II, which held that courts should focus on the objective reasonableness of parties’ litigation positions but consider all other relevant factors when determining whether to award attorney’s fees. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 4:28 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:25 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 2:31 pm
And he does. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:42 pm
(Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Clarence Thomas joined the dissent. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:16 pm
If the government does not ask the Justices to reconsider, or if it does so but is turned down, the case then goes back to Judge Hanen’s court. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 12:51 pm
The bill does not clearly address whether the change would be retroactive to December 1, 2015. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 12:51 pm
The bill does not clearly address whether the change would be retroactive to December 1, 2015. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 8:05 am
” Sweatt v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 4:26 am
Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 10:08 pm
Plaintiff sued Defendant, American Express, and John Doe/ABC Co. to recover payments made by customer’s credit cards. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:05 am
., John Oliver); opens global markets. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:19 pm
He notes that Chief Justice John Marshall long ago wrote that “Congress cannot punish felonies generally” (in the 1821 case Cohens v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:29 pm
Chief Justice John G. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:12 am
” At his eponymous blog, Kenneth Jost criticizes the dissenting opinion of Chief Justice John Roberts in Williams v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2016, 12:33 pm
Additional Resources: Goodman v. [read post]
18 Jun 2016, 5:09 am
While the press release does not make clear which specific proceedings Iran was referring to in its application, the trigger for the filing appears to be the Supreme Court’s April decision in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
