Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3" Results 6221 - 6240 of 7,891
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
(a)(2); counts 1 and 2), and one count of failing to register as a sex offender (former § 290, subd. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 5:27 pm by Glenn Reynolds
Vermont Castings makes some nice grills, but they’re 2 to 3 times the price of a Weber. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
This cost underestimates the true cost as it does not include the cost of weather delays on airline customers, e.g., from lost productivity, wages, etc. 1 Since June 2003, carriers that account for at least 1 percent of domestic scheduled passenger revenues have reported the cause for both flight cancellations and/or delays in the categories of weather, carrier, national airspace system (NAS), and security. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 9:40 am by Jeff Gamso
  Brett spearheaded years of effort to get that changed.And changed it was.Effective July 1 this year, we have open discovery in Ohio (Rule 16, here). [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 11:05 pm
Id. at 469-71; see also Sobel, supra note 2, at 1606. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 2:14 am by John L. Welch
I think the Board did a better job than usual in keeping clear the distinction between de facto and de jure functionality.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:01 pm by Michael Geist
  The Supreme Court of Canada has identified six non-exhaustive factors to assist a court‘s fairness inquiry: (1) the purpose of the dealing; (2) the character of the dealing; (3) the amount of the dealing; (4) alternatives to the dealing; (5) the nature of the work; and (6) the effect of the dealing on the work. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 9:23 am by Philip Thomas
     Plaintiff Baby John Doe 1)     $45,852.67  for past medical expenses 2)     $1,500,000.00 for future medical expenses 3)     $25,000.00 for pain and suffering 4)     $75,000.00 for future lost wages TOTAL:          $1,645,852.67  The verdict will be reduced by 15% to factor in  the… [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 3:26 pm by Luke Gilman
Del Barber-Poor Michael’s-17July2010-Part 1 from Celes Davar on Vimeo. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 2:19 pm by Lawrence Solum
 This is the so-called American rule.(2) The government pays for all lawyers. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 4:49 am by Maxwell Kennerly
— For purposes of this section, the terms “knowing” and “knowingly” mean that a person, with respect to information— (1) has actual knowledge of the information; (2) acts in deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of the information; or (3) acts in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the information, and no proof of specific intent to defraud is required. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 12:47 am by Michael Geist
  The Supreme Court of Canada has identified six non-exhaustive factors to assist a Court‘s fairness inquiry: (1) the purpose of the dealing; (2) the character of the dealing; (3) the amount of the dealing; (4) alternatives to the dealing; (5) the nature of the work; and (6) the effect of the dealing on the work. [read post]