Search for: "Level v. State"
Results 6221 - 6240
of 29,839
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2020, 8:26 am
Corley, 273 F.3d 429, 449 (2d Cir. 2001); see also United States v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:00 am
As NSO Group notes in its reply brief, Republic of Philippines v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Lucas and Giorgianni v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 2:35 pm
A consent should expressly acknowledge the original and new compensation levels and specify when compensation will return to the original levels (if known) or that the reduction will continue indefinitely until further notice. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:38 pm
Under Teague v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 12:32 pm
In The Municipality Gratuity Fund v West Rand District Municipality and the Pension Funds Adjudicator, the West Rand Municipality, a participating employer in the Municipality Gratuity Fund had not made payment of contributions within the prescribed period. [read post]
21 May 2020, 7:50 am
Should Roe v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 9:01 pm
In New Energy Company Co. v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 2:36 pm
(Note that some states, including Alaska, California, New Mexico, and Pennsylvania do not allow this calculation under state law.) [read post]
20 May 2020, 12:45 pm
Credit Union v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 12:45 pm
Credit Union v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 4:00 am
Arconti v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 6:38 pm
In R. v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 4:18 pm
The cse of ATV ZRT v Hungary concerned sections 12(3) and (4) of the Act which prohibits media service providers from adding ‘any opinion or evaluative explanation to the political news’ without ‘distinguishing it from the news [itself]’. [read post]
19 May 2020, 4:08 pm
V. [read post]
19 May 2020, 10:37 am
It is a paradox that, as far as this point is concerned, the effect of the Directive has been exactly the contrary of the objective sought by the Community Legislator: instead of enhancing the level of intellectual property protection, it has lowered the threshold of protection previously envisaged in some member states, such as Spain. [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:33 pm
Contracts may allow some level of lenience, however, by including language such as “hindered,” “impeded,” or “interfered with” in addition to “prevented. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:11 pm
The article reported on what was stated in the LoR. [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:05 am
(See Benitez v United Homes of N. [read post]
18 May 2020, 3:15 am
Hearthside Baking, Scafom International BV v. [read post]
