Search for: "MATTER OF T F"
Results 6221 - 6240
of 13,727
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2015, 9:09 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 8:02 am
., 334 F.3d 1264 (Fed. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 4:27 pm
La Cour de cassation a confirmé l’exactitude de l’analyse de la cour d’appel en retenant « l’absence de tout fait d’actualité comme de tout débat d’intérêt général dont l’information légitime du public aurait justifié qu’il fût rendu compte »”. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 6:52 am
Readers who don’t like that kind of thing should probably skip ahead to Step 3. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 8:34 pm
The supplemental shelter allowance shall be retroactive in the sum of $7,000.00 from January 2002 to January 2004 commensurate with actual rent charged by owner, SJ, also referred to as Sigfridus F. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 5:26 am
One audience member "politely" suggested that if they couldn't find a single court to side with them in 50+ years, perhaps it was time to move on. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 5:15 am
Knoblauch, 566 F. 3d 572, 580 (CA5 2009) (“[I]t would be unreasonable to expect a police officer to make the numerous legal conclusions necessary to apply Garner to a highspeed car chase . . . [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 4:49 am
I won’t rehearse the full facts, but it does make pretty grim reading. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 11:56 am
” (Terminology matters, and appellants had consistently referred to the exception as the “significant effects” exception.) [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 11:56 am
This means that either party may file for a divorce without proving any grounds other than the spouses don't want to be married anymore. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Don’t get us started on older examples like Bendectin ... or vaccines.We’ll start where we left off in our earlier post – with the Restatement. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:34 am
.* The Beautiful Game: a view of the EPO Board of Appeal manpower shortageAt the European Patent Office (EPO), it may appear to the interested bystander that fielding a weakened team is to become a matter of official policy and that the Boards of Appeal are assumed to deliver better results when their numbers are depleted. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 10:01 pm
Instead, the agency states that “it won’t take exception to farmers” who comply with USDA’s National Organic Program standards. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:04 am
I just google “F R Civ P 26,” and LII is there to provide the answer I’m looking for. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 10:42 am
Indeed, although “[t]he court may review [the jury’s exercise of] discretion” it may not review “the amount awarded unless shown to be clearly arbitrary. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:37 am
The court went on to note that[f]ollowing the lead of the Supreme Court in Horton v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 5:04 pm
Moreover, substantial evidence in the record – namely, the May 2012 memo – explained the addendum’s refinements (and the court noted the addendum itself didn’t need to do so) and supported the board’s decision not to recirculate. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 12:10 pm
And prior to the late 1980s, it was an area of collection activity that just didn't implicate FISA. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 7:45 am
., 49 F. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:08 pm
In view of the passage of so much time, extensive discovery and the lack of notice to defendants of the additional transactions and occurrences (see CPLR 203 [f]), it would clearly be improvident to permit plaintiffs to expand their pleadings to add facts within their personal knowledge. [read post]
