Search for: "MAY v. US " Results 6221 - 6240 of 120,412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am by Hope Lewis - Guest
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 8:54 am by Bryan Heaney
To do use it otherwise runs against the grain of the statute. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 7:32 am
Back on March 11, The Indiana Supreme Court handed down its opinion (PDF format) in Central Indiana Podiatry v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2015-02-07: Zebra Stripes and Polka Dots May be Protected by US C… http://t.co/Q34uSN7aCA -> Jurisdiction simplicitor in copyright Geophysical Service Incorporated v Arcis Seismic Solutions Corp, 2015 ABQB 88 http://t.co/kLDKVTFk8u -> Jurisdiction in tort claims Candoo Excavating Services Ltd. et al. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 9:35 am by Gerard Magliocca
The case held, of course, that the states may not add qualifications to congressional candidates beyond those in the text of the Constitution. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:58 pm by Patricia Hughes
Earlier this month, the Ontario Divisional Court released its decision (by the Court) in Canadian Federation of Students v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:11 am
Opposer claimed that it may rely on use of the name CINGULAR by its controlled subsidiary, New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("New Cingular"). [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Jareb Gleckel
By slipping a rational-basis inquiry into Casey’s undue-burden analysis, the Chief may be pulling a Marbury v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 5:42 am by Eric Goldman
Partisan elections are generally a bad way of staffing the judiciary, because the partisanship distracts voters from assessing the key qualities of judges, plus judicial elections can distort how the judges vote (i.e., they worry about how rival candidates will spin the vote in the next election, or they may prioritize popular outcomes over the rule of law) and write their opinions (the opinions may play to the crowd or use opinions as an extension of their campaign… [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 11:53 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Provided however that :[…](iii) where a Plant is located on a Tributary of The Jhelum on which Pakistan has any Agricultural use or hydro-electric use, the water released below the Plant may be delivered, if necessary, into another Tributary but only to the extent that the then existing Agricultural Use or hydro-electric use by Pakistan on the former Tributary would not be adversely affected." [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 1:47 am by Tom Pritchard
Summary On 23 June 2016 the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Manolete Partners plc v Hastings Borough Council. [read post]