Search for: "Majors v. Majors"
Results 6221 - 6240
of 55,566
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm
Coupled with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
In Bartlett v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 7:13 am
The rules can be changed by a majority, correct? [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
The Texas Supreme Court has handed down a major ruling in defense of free speech this week. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:25 am
But Judge Lee's majority opinion says that it's not -- at least on summary judgment -- because it's unclear what the officer's comment means.Do you think you know what the officer meant? [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 4:15 pm
But that's the dissent.The majority says there isn't a genuine issue of material fact; the shadows didn't cause the accident, which was instead caused by a hit-and-run driver who was going between 50 and 70 miles per hour -- on Halloween evening, no less -- on a street that had trick-and-treaters dressed in all black and a posted speed limit of 25 mph when kids were present (and 45 mph otherwise).Just because you have an expert doesn't mean that you'll… [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 1:53 pm
That paragraph reads:"With today‘s decision, a majority of the court undermines this pillar of our jurisprudence, finding legal invoices sent from a law firm to its client, although initially protected by the attorney-client privilege, may lose such protection once the subject litigation is concluded. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 11:07 am
He's a major player. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 11:48 am
Today, the California Supreme Court denies review, but a majority of the justices (four) author a statement concerning the denial of review to urge the Legislature to look at the underlying statute and potentially change it.That's super rare. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 2:22 pm
And the parents (and their counsel) don't get paid the vast majority of the attorney's fees they've run up in this incredibly long-running IDEA saga. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am
Thomas J for the majority (Roberts CJ, and Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett JJ concurring) held that a restriction on carrying arms in public for self-defense reasons was inconsistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearms regulation and was thus unconstitutional. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
The case was Reynolds v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 10:36 pm
Supreme Court, where a bare 5-4 majority reverses his conviction. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 8:39 am
Kahle v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 11:13 am
The interpretation of U.S. v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 10:41 am
In Cisco Systems v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 1:08 pm
Justice Gorsuch's majority opinion did not come out to formally overrule that case. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:27 am
The Supreme Court decision in Janus Capital Group v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
Holdings, Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:00 pm
See, generally, Roper v. [read post]
