Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 6221 - 6240
of 21,692
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2012, 11:59 pm
United States and Miss United States of America : The potential loss of good will and customers by plaintiff, and possible damage to its reputation, as a result of defendants’ alleged infringement of plaintiff’s marks is not easily quantifiable or remediable by damages, and supports a finding of irreparable harm. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“Starbucks V”) concluding that Starbucks failed to prove that the defendant’s use of the marks MISTER CHARBUCKS and CHARBUCKS BLEND is likely to dilute Starbucks’s famous marks including, of course, STARBUCKS. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
School Dist. v New York State Pub. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
School Dist. v New York State Pub. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 7:09 am
See, e.g., Bush v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 11:54 am
Here is the motion to dismiss in Pro-Football Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:26 pm
On 30th September 2011 in State of Haryana v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:10 am
One v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 4:55 am
” In an article in Cato’s Supreme Court Review, Mark Rienzi discusses the fallout from last Term’s ruling in Zubik v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
Registration v. acquisition is also a big deal. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 6:40 pm
Supreme Court has posted online the transcript and audio of today’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:19 am
TheInfluence of Member State Submissions on Copyright Law” (forthcoming Modern LawReview)]This paper presented a really fascinating look at the "explosion" of copyright jurisprudence at the CJEU. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 5:13 pm
Land O’Lakes has attempted to minimize the award as being “advisory,” stating the judge will have the final say.On a related note, the Minneapolis/St. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 4:38 am
" (emphasis added)); United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:05 pm
As we stated in State v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 8:17 am
The district court’s judgment was vacated and the case remanded for trial (Tiffany and Company v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:55 am
Staff picks are marked by asterisks. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:33 pm
Kugle and Mark M. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:33 pm
Kugle and Mark M. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:33 pm
Kugle and Mark M. [read post]
