Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 6221 - 6240
of 13,103
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2011, 5:17 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 4:02 pm
In the case of Smith v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 6:29 am
Miller, No. 08-0580/AR (granted 9 Oct); United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:57 pm
” In United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 10:00 am
The case since has settled.Computer Fraud and Abuse ActThe most significant CFAA case of the past several years has been United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 11:42 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 7:24 pm
The parties' briefs are available here; the brief of the United States is available here. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 9:08 am
The case is American Tradition Partnership v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 11:15 am
But the United States Supreme Court granted Dow’s petition for certiorari on June 28, 2011, ordered that the judgment be vacated and remanded the matter for further consideration in light of J. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 11:22 am
The order was issued in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:05 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a ruling in the case of United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 10:05 pm
United States – as well as one case from the December sitting, Janus Capital v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 11:36 am
United States (argued in the November sitting) remain the oldest undecided cases, along with Janus Capital v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 12:56 pm
Head, Lieutenant General Charles Jacoby, and United States, Appellees. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:03 pm
In a significant and surprising development, on August 24 the Solicitor General of the United States filed a brief in the Supreme Court asserting that a groundbreaking climate change decision by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals should be vacated and remanded for further consideration. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 6:38 am
In Tapis International v INS , 94 F. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
In any event, "judicial review [of an Article 78 petition] is limited to the facts and record adduced before the agency" (Matter of Benjamin v Dept. of Haus. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
In any event, "judicial review [of an Article 78 petition] is limited to the facts and record adduced before the agency" (Matter of Benjamin v Dept. of Haus. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:24 am
The Court of Appeals also noted that the United States Supreme Court stated a “basic teaching of representative government … that elected officials represent all of those who elect them, and not merely those who are their neighbors," citing Dusch (387 US 112, Dallas County, Alabama v Reese (421 US 477) and Fortson v Dorsey, 379 US 433. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 11:00 am
Related posts:Kiobel Before the Supreme Court New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed Norwegian Supreme Court on the Lugano Convention Art 5.1. [read post]
