Search for: "Reiter v Reiter"
Results 6221 - 6240
of 6,294
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am
In the past, many have observed anecdotally and cynically that even after many years of deliberation and millions of dollars in legal and expert fees often expended, the tariff at the end of the day has often the simple arithmetical average of the amounts proposed by the proponent and opponent(s) +/– a few percent.However, that pattern, if it was ever true, has been changing and the Board has issued some surprising and encouraging decision. in recent yearsThe Board has refused to set… [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 8:28 am
Coronavirus has come to the Caribbean. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 12:52 pm
Your taxes are going up. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:39 am
The EPO subsequently assigned it the new European application No. 05 858 797.3.V. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 2:48 pm
Session 2: The Product Market DimensionRobert Burrell: why do we treat territorial and product markets so differently? [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm
Every year, my distinguished colleague at Penn State, Jan M. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:33 pm
He has been awarded the Vespasian V. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:27 am
For more information on SEC v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 11:16 am
Phillips, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 6:26 pm
It may have amused certain of his cronies to see good ol' boy Ezra Levant ambush, bully and harangue the very unfortunate woman assigned by the Alberta Human Rights and Citizenship Commission to investigate the complaints advanced against him. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:06 am
The Justice Department’s current investigation of criminal efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election apparently is taking two paths. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:42 am
” Even though the SEC staff might have viewed the 2011 SEC CF Guidance as simply a reiteration of previously existing requirements, there remained little doubt at the time of its publication that the 2011 SEC CF Guidance imposed an arguably unprecedented and certainly significant obligation upon public companies. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 4:14 pm
Out of necessity I need to reiterate certain points I made in previous blog posts in order to explain new points below. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:16 am
(Pix credit: Mexico: López Obrador and a memorable speech in the Zócalo: “With the people everything, without the people nothing” (Full text))I have been writing about the most interesting speech delivered to the representatives of the Mexican state assembled in Congress at an gathering to which a large number of foreign representatives were also in attendance. [read post]
28 May 2011, 7:56 am
Sharma v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:59 am
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that more than 76 million incidents of foodborne illness occur in the United States each year. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 8:01 pm
Em vários precedentes, usuários pediam devolução dos valores pagos por uma contraprestação por serviço não oferecida – cobrança sem que chamadas fossem feitas. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 8:01 pm
Em vários precedentes, usuários pediam devolução dos valores pagos por uma contraprestação por serviço não oferecida – cobrança sem que chamadas fossem feitas. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
Writing for a majority of the Supreme Court in Hinchey, L’Heureux-Dubé J. reiterated the importance of this point by concluding that: For a government, actual integrity is achieved when its employees remain free of any type of corruption. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am
I will reiterate here that my argument is not about removal, but there is also a more important consideration: If the “class of persons subject to impeachment” requirement of Article II can simply be erased because a general power to impeach, try and convict is given the House and Senate in Article I, what would become of the “grounds for impeachment” requirement of Article II? [read post]
