Search for: "Robert Thomas" Results 6221 - 6240 of 10,848
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Nichols; article by Raj Bhala; reply by Robert J. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 6:32 am
Robert Bruce Mullin, who is ECUSA's primary (and well-compensated) expert historian witness. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 8:44 am by Chip Merlin
Forensic owner Robert Kochan talked his way back into King's good graces, testimony showed, sending a second engineer to examine the house. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Two recent Supreme Court rulings that were handed down barely one month apart address the same, important topic: Under what circumstances may federal district courts insist on proof of matters that go to the merits of the case as a precondition for allowing the plaintiffs to proceed via a class action, rather than through a series of individual lawsuits? [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 4:18 am by Broc Romanek
These were the findings: - Ann Yerger - 32% - Huckleberry Finn - 27% - Robert Khuzami - 12% - Elisse Walter - 10% - Nell Minow - 9% - Sallie Krawcheck - 8% - Richard Ketchum - 5% - Mary John Miller - 5% - William Brodsky - 3% - Damon Silvers - 1% Webcast: "D&O Insurance Today" Tune in tomorrow for the webcast - "D&O Insurance Today" - to hear Tom Bentz of Holland & Knight, Peter Critchell of AIG Property Casualty, Heather Fox of ARC Excess & Surplus and… [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 9:15 am by The Federalist Society
 Chief Justice Roberts, as well as Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer and Kagan joined the majority opinion. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 9:15 am by The Federalist Society
 Chief Justice Roberts, as well as Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer and Kagan joined the majority opinion. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 6:36 pm by Dan Ernst
Bailey was followed in other, similar cases in the 1920s and 1930s, and none of these decisions has been formally overruled.Chief Justice Roberts did not reject the authority of the Child Labor Tax Case. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:45 am by Conor McEvily
   At Talking Points Memo, Sahil Kapur discusses the prospect that Justice Thomas could vote to strike down the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), suggesting that, “[i]n this case, [Justice Thomas’s] storied record against federal power appears to line up neatly with an argument, backed by some conservative and libertarian scholars, for overturning [DOMA]. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 7:48 am by William G. Ross
The Court next became a major issue in 1924, when the Progressive Party candidate, Wisconsin Senator Robert M. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 3:54 pm by The Federalist Society
 Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Kennedy, Thomas and Alito joined the majority opinion. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 3:54 pm by The Federalist Society
 Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Kennedy, Thomas and Alito joined the majority opinion. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 7:44 am by The Federalist Society
Robbins.Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Thomas, Ginsburg, Alito, Sotomayor and Kagan joined Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 7:44 am by The Federalist Society
Robbins.Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Thomas, Ginsburg, Alito, Sotomayor and Kagan joined Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm by Glenn
This article was published by the ABA Antitrust Section’s Unilateral Conduct Committee in its Monopoly Matters journal for Spring 2013. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 9:12 am by Steven G. Pearl
Here is the syllabus from the opinion, which was written by Scalia, with Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito joining:  Petitioners, Comcast Corporation and its subsidiaries, allegedly “cluster” their cable television operations within a particular region by swapping their systems outside the region for competitor systems inside the region. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 8:08 am
  Early in the oral argument [in Windsor], the conservatives — Antonin Scalia, Samuel Alito and Chief Justice John Roberts (a silent Clarence Thomas can be assumed to be their tacit tagalong) — explored the idea that the case might be disposed of on the technical grounds that no injury had been proved, a technique that would avoid a ruling calling DOMA unconstitutional. [read post]