Search for: "Self v State"
Results 6221 - 6240
of 14,112
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
Celexa was brought by some rather self-important plaintiffs seeking, under state law, to enjoin the sale of an FDA-approved drug because the efficacy data on which approval was based was allegedly wrong. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 1:23 pm
(Ilya Somin) Today is the fifth anniversary of Kelo v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 2:56 am
In the case of Kidwell v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 10:58 pm
See Hawkins v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
In concluding that deference was required in considering Law Society rules, Justice Wagner stated that “In the case at bar, the legislature specifically gave the Law Society a broad discretion to regulate the legal profession on the basis of a number of policy considerations related to the public interest. [read post]
19 May 2016, 5:30 pm
Meanwhile, modern precedents such as the Court’s 1971 decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 8:50 am
And, he maintained, the Supreme Court said in Jordan v. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm
Unfortunately 2022 started with some bad news 👎 for insureds and their liability insurers that are or will be facing lawsuits in New York state courts.Heretofore in New York state court practice, discovery proceeded via demands and responses. [read post]
23 May 2025, 1:38 pm
Bessent and March 7 in the NLRB case, Wilcox v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:45 pm
See United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm
Woollard v. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 10:09 am
As it was pointed out in Marbury v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:39 pm
Background In March 2018, the United States Supreme Court held in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am
Corp. v. 2319 Richmond Terrace Corp., 141 A.D.3d 626, 627, 34 N.Y.S.3d 616).Oral promise to pay credit card bills during the pendency of action unenforceable In Novick v Novick, ‑‑‑ N.Y.S.3d ‑‑‑‑, 2019 WL 2202438 (Mem), 2019 N.Y. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:18 am
The Court (Lord Judge, Lord Neuberger and Maurice Kay LJ) unanimously upheld the rulings of Mann J and Vos J that, as a result of the operation of section 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, Mr Mulcaire was not entitled to rely on his privilege against self-incrimination (“PSI”). [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 12:58 am
If a mentally ill person chooses to represent themselves at trial and can't put on a coherent defense that rises above the level of babbling, I'd think that calls into question the quality of the court's decision that the person was "competent" to stand trial in the first place.But attorneys for states and the federal government argued at SCOTUS this week in Indiana v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 12:42 am
The case is SA Broadcasting Corporation (SOC) Ltd and Another v Motsoeneng and Others (A2022/046784) [2024] ZAGPJHC 688 (30 July 2024). [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 7:58 am
Suffer No Tyranny How State-Tribal Relations Might Evolve in the Light of the Supreme Court’s Michigan v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:48 am
In the recent case of Sarkisian v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 12:45 pm
This isn’t self-correcting. [read post]
