Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 6221 - 6240 of 13,843
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2015, 12:04 pm
Employment Division, Department of Human Resources v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 8:14 am by Jon Ibanez
” According to the United States Supreme Court, two things must occur before Miranda Rights attach; 1.) a custody and, 2.) an interrogation. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
Animal rights organisation People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has taken legal action in the United States on the monkey’s behalf (apparently named Naruto), claiming that the animal owns the copyright in the successful photographs and should therefore reap the benefits financially. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 5:54 am
 However, animal rights organisation People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has taken legal action in the United States on the monkey’s behalf (naming it Naruto), claiming that the animal owns the copyright in the successful photographs and should therefore reap the benefits financially. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:14 am by Tim Sitzmann
In 2006, the Ninth Circuit sided with a concessionaire over the State of California in Dept. of Parks and Rec. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 1:32 pm
Rather than recite the facts of this extremely interesting case, I'll merely cut-and-paste the money quote from Judge Wardlaw's majority opinion (to which Judge Pregerson dissents):"Once again, an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of California overstepped the boundaries of permissible questioning and argument. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 10:42 am by Brett Trout
Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution secures to authors, for a limited time, the exclusive right to their writings. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 10:42 am by Brett Trout
Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution secures to authors, for a limited time, the exclusive right to their writings. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 5:17 am by David Markus
That standard worked for a while, but with the development of new technology, it has become very difficultThe first case was “United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 11:09 am by Josh H. Escovedo
On September 9, 2015, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that Costco was willfully infringing Tiffany & Co. [read post]