Search for: "State v. Code"
Results 6221 - 6240
of 27,232
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2018, 1:26 pm
’” Williams v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 9:03 am
AB 5, which went into effect January 1, 2020, codified in the Labor Code the “ABC” test for determining independent contractor status that the California Supreme Court adopted in its 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:38 pm
Stern v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 11:09 am
(Eugene Volokh) From Carino v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:15 am
Marie v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
Code, § 500.) [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 9:56 am
Indeed, the Delaware Supreme Court reached that same conclusion with respect to California Corporations Code Section 2115 in Vantagepoint Venture Partners 1996 v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 10:02 am
H.R.2284: To amend title 54, United States Code, to provide for congressional and State approval of national monuments and restrictions on the use of national monuments. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 7:05 am
See People v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 12:15 am
Buttonwood Tree Value Partners, L.P. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:42 am
Spear Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 8:47 pm
In Waves Audio Ltd v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:12 am
The most important smartphone IP ruling in the months ahead is going to be the opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the Oracle v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:04 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:41 am
In relation to the first issue, he began by noting that the only basis upon which it could be said that the information intercepted from the claimants’ phones constituted ‘intellectual property’ as defined in section 72(5) was if it was ‘technical or commercial information or other intellectual property’. [22] Lord Neuberger rejected the argument put forward by the Secretary of State (as an interested party) that “commercial information” should be… [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 8:21 am
So holds State v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:12 pm
In Becker v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 10:04 am
The FAA’s goal of promoting arbitration as a means of private dispute resolution did not preclude the California Legislature from deputizing employees to prosecute Labor Code violations on the state’s behalf. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 3:20 am
Automatic termination from public office by operation of lawSchirmer v Town of Harrison, USDC, SDNY, 1999 WL 61843Foley v Bratton, Court of Appeals, 92 NY2d 781 [Decided with Griffin v Bratton]Police officers are public officers and as such a subject to the provisions of Section 30.1 of the Public Officers Law. [read post]
