Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 6221 - 6240 of 9,114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Yet neither the district court, nor the court of appeals that affirmed the ruling, ordered the PTO to cancel the registration, despite that registration’s invalidity. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 10:53 am by Miriam Seifter
The question presented in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:38 pm by Victoria Kwan
Two decades after writing the landmark United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
The second Ordinance is said to have been brought in to transfer seven mandals (sub-districts) from the new State of Telangana back to Andhra Pradesh before the bifurcation takes effect. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am by Roger Parloff
Counting last week’s Cawthorn ruling, Section 3 challenges have now generated two state and three federal judicial rulings—the first opinions on Section 3 in a century and a half. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 7:18 am by Jared Beck
That’s strong language and, to my knowledge, the first judicial pronouncement that the economic events of 2008 were so extraordinary as to excuse performance under a pre-existing contract. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:17 am
Street artThe US District Court for the Eastern District of New York has recently issued its decision in the 5Pointz case. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 5:28 am by Guest Author
An added bonus for Roberts is that the MQD will now make its way into the federal district courts and circuit courts of appeal. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 1:23 pm by Stewart Baker
  Just what we need:  another opportunity for the Roberts Court to pad a narrow ruling with a lot of ill-considered dicta about Smith v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 11:06 am
  Just what we need:  another opportunity for the Roberts Court to pad a narrow ruling with a lot of ill-considered dicta about Smith v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:17 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Davis argued that the district court erred in taking judicial notice of three disclosure documents not attached to the complaint. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 7:12 am by John Elwood
§ 2244(b)(2) if the judge concealed his bias by failing to recuse himself, and the public exposure of his bigotry after the conclusion of Halprin’s initial habeas proceedings in the district court created Halprin’s first fair opportunity to present his claim. [read post]