Search for: "State v. Husband" Results 6221 - 6240 of 7,278
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am by Dave
That proposition was effectively trumped by Terry Gallivan, Counsel for Islington, who relied on the contrary proposition in Akinbolu v Hackney LBC (1997) 29 HLR 259, 269 as well as that old chestnut R v Sec of State for the Environment ex p Tower Hamlets LBC [1993] QB 632, 643, neither of which had been cited to Collins J. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am by Dave
That proposition was effectively trumped by Terry Gallivan, Counsel for Islington, who relied on the contrary proposition in Akinbolu v Hackney LBC (1997) 29 HLR 259, 269 as well as that old chestnut R v Sec of State for the Environment ex p Tower Hamlets LBC [1993] QB 632, 643, neither of which had been cited to Collins J. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:28 am by NL
She stated that, although her husband had not physically assaulted her, she had been subjected to emotional, psychological and financial abuse. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:28 am by NL
She stated that, although her husband had not physically assaulted her, she had been subjected to emotional, psychological and financial abuse. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:01 pm
After all, despite the court’s attempt to distinguish Wooley v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 1:09 pm by Hull & Hull LLP
  One of the reasons why it was distinguishable was because this case, Newport v. [read post]