Search for: "State v. Land"
Results 6221 - 6240
of 13,259
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2010, 7:10 am
As an example of the usefulness of these, take the case of Abbott v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:00 am
Earlier today, in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 11:49 am
| Jaguar Land Rover DEFEND[ER]s its trade mark | Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week! [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:05 am
Constitution and state law. [read post]
7 May 2012, 1:07 pm
In its first visit to state court, the property owner defeated the redevelopment authority's attempt to condemn its land. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 3:13 am
In United States v. 480.00 Acres of Land, No. 07-13584 (Feb. 11, 2009), the 11th Circuit held that in calculating compensation, the federal government could take advantage of the fact that the local government's restrictive land use regulations had severely depressed the value of the acquired property. [read post]
9 May 2017, 11:48 am
State of Ohio v City of Middletown, 2017 WL 1857271 (6th Cir CA 5/8/2017) Filed under: Due Process, Equal Protection, Rezoning, Takings [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
(Houseman v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 2:29 pm
Ass'n v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 6:08 am
Osagiede v United States September 9, 2008.Editor's Note. [read post]
15 Dec 2024, 10:35 am
Ferko v Ealing Magistrates Court & Ors (2024) EWHC 2592 (Admin) This was an appeal by case stated to the High Court from a decision of Ealing Magistrates Court on a statutory nuisance/section 82 Environmental Protection Act 1990 prosecution. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 8:00 am
District Courts in Florida and one Florida state court do not. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 1:02 am
Gila River Camp, Arizona Korematsu v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:33 pm
" DeJetley v. [read post]
7 Feb 2009, 12:32 pm
In the Matter of Suffolk Asphalt Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:38 pm
P'ship v. [read post]
7 Feb 2009, 12:32 pm
In the Matter of Suffolk Asphalt Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 5:30 am
Roy v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 2:41 am
In Occidental Chemical Corporation v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm
Lyon Docket: 11-80 Issue: (1) Whether, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(b), courts may adjudicate and compromise legal rights in land to which the United States holds title without the United States’s participation in the litigation; and (2) whether, in light of this Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
