Search for: "State v. Losee" Results 6221 - 6240 of 13,194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2012, 3:22 am
Hearsay evidence, said the court, can be the basis of an administrative determination and, “if sufficiently probative, it alone may constitute substantial evidence," citing Matter of Café La China Corp. v New York State Liq. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 11:42 am
Justice Stevens also joined the majority when the Supreme Court further developed those limitations in State Farm v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 5:33 am by Amy Howe
” At the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, Lisa Soronen analyzes last week’s decision in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:57 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Van Allen loses because the state's interest in discouraging party raiding and encouraging the participation of new voters outweighs Van Allen's interest in registering with the party of his choice only a few weeks before the election. [read post]
25 May 2022, 1:09 pm by JURIST Staff
Automatism as previously defined by the Court is “a state of impaired consciousness, rather than unconsciousness, in which an individual, though capable of action, has no voluntary control over that action” (R v Stone, paragraph 156). [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 7:51 am by Annemarie Bridy
[T]he evidence shows that Cox’s decisions not to terminate . . . were based on one goal: not losing revenue from paying subscribers. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
BLOOMBERG ON COURT DECISION ON STATE RENT LAWS "Today's decision [in Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., L.P.] [read post]
8 May 2017, 10:17 am
“Does it matter that most innovative activity, at least in the United States, is taking place in a small number of venture capital funded locations? [read post]
30 May 2017, 10:33 pm
Kat Eleonora Rosati critically analyses how the new text of the DSM Strategy and its narrow data mining exception could affect start-ups and SMEs and compares the envisaged system with that already in force in the UK.Nestlé loses yet another KitKat battle Roland Mallinson reports on the Court of Appeal decision Nestlé v Cadbury [2017] EWCA Civ 358. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:01 am by Roelke Law, P.A.
  When motions to suppress are granted, the state loses the ability to present the suppressed evidence at trial. [read post]