Search for: "State v. P. B."
Results 6221 - 6240
of 6,786
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2008, 12:27 pm
” United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 10:16 am
Case Name: Concerned Citizens of Spring Creek Ranch v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 9:39 pm
B. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 7:18 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 5:26 pm
Amoco Oil Co., 835 P.2d 534 (Colo. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 4:23 pm
B. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: YouTube – Prince demands removal of song from YouTube, Radiohead demand it is put back online: (Techdirt), (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (The Trademark Blog), Japan planning fair use provision: (Michael Geist), (Techdirt), (IP Justice), (Patry Copyright Blog), Judge rejects Yoko Ono’s request for preliminary injunction… [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 11:26 pm
Amoco Oil Co., 835 P.2d 534 (Colo. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
John B. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
BAC level), whereas HGN does not. 16 A very recent investigation17 found that only HGN was effective at distinguishing persons above or below a BAC of .04%, a standard sometimes applied to drivers of commercial vehicles and, in some states, to drivers younger than 21. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 2:14 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:27 pm
P’ship, 213 F.3d 175, 180 (4th Cir. 2000) (stating that the court “need not accept as true unwarranted inferences, unreasonable conclusions, or arguments”). [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:00 pm
In McCarther v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 1:33 am
Appropriations made by this act shall remain in full force and effect for liabilities incurred through 3/31/2009 PART B §18. immediately and shall be deemed to have been in full force and effect on and after 4/1/2007. [read post]
29 May 2008, 11:00 am
Broderick v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 4:33 pm
Chambers of Judge Arlene P. [read post]
28 May 2008, 6:42 am
Collup (1946) 27 Cal.2d 829, 834 [167 P.2d 714]; People v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 2:02 am
The Court has referred in its reasoning to the ILC Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts in its Judgment on the merits in the Congo v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
P. 35(b) motion claiming that warden's alleged promise to create an opportunity for a sentence reduction as a reward for his assistance in prison effectively bound the government to file a Rule 35(b) motion on his behalf, judgment denying relief is affirmed where: 1) even if the warden did promise to file a Rule 35(b) motion, a warden within the Bureau of Prisons was unauthorized to make the motion as the "government" under Rule 35(b); and… [read post]
21 May 2008, 2:11 pm
Gould and Susan P. [read post]
