Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 6221 - 6240
of 13,699
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2015, 2:12 pm
Consequently, OHIM must refuse to register any mark which is covered by one of the situations described in Article 13 [now Reglation 1151/2012]... and if the mark has already been registered, must declare that registration to be invalid. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 1:33 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 1:33 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 9:23 am
The challengers rely heavily upon a ruling in 2000 by the Supreme Court, in Rice v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 3:02 am
" Ashe v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am
Gajra has been implicated in certain practices at the General Register Office (GRO), according to Wikileaks. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 9:04 pm
" And so, "absent agreement or other definitive obligation, this State, as opposed to some others does not hold a child liable for the support of his or her parent. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm
V. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:35 am
V. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm
Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm
The battle was over Carl’s attempt to use and register the trademark SANDWICH POCKETS. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 11:07 am
We know from many, many appellate cases that being a habitual felon is a status, not a crime, State v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 11:07 am
We know from many, many appellate cases that being a habitual felon is a status, not a crime, State v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:25 am
State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 7:42 am
” These U.S. firms are generally out of luck, because they failed to register the Chinese version of their brand name in China, according to Harris. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 1:18 pm
Citing Corrente v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 8:44 am
” State v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 8:44 am
” State v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 6:48 am
And he does it pro se, without a lawyer.The case is Barnes v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 3:20 pm
If there was federal regulation – defendants would have clarity in their positions – and state law claim would likely be pre-empted, see e.g., Lam v. [read post]
