Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 6221 - 6240
of 16,393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2011, 9:30 pm
The Supreme Court ruling in Mathew v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 7:34 am
Scis., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 2:37 am
People v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
[v] See chapter 3 of Scott D. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
11 May 2021, 9:47 am
Trucking Ass’n v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:16 am
Should Roe v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 6:30 am
Casey and Roe v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 8:12 pm
Previously, the New York Court of Appeals had affirmed a rejection of that claim (People v Ramchair, 8 NY3d 313, 316 [2007]) reasoning that appellate counsel's brief to the Appellate Division had been “comprehensive,” and the arguments raised therein “strong” (Id.). [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:39 pm
It was ruled in McMinn v Town of Oyster Bay and Udell v Haas that because they are legislative enactments, these land-use regulations generally enjoy a strong presumption of constitutionality as valid exercises of the State's police power to advance the public health, safety and welfare. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:13 pm
The case is Nevada Commission on Ethics v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 9:18 am
Spending over six pages detailing United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 1:24 pm
There is a strong case precedent for Judge Shore’s decision including the the strangely similar case of MacKinney v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 11:16 am
" United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Evansand United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
In the first four parts of our series on the California v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:59 am
In McKenzie v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:29 am
(See Stormans, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:29 am
(See Stormans, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 4:23 am
Cir. 1991) (noting that there is a “strong presumption in favor of public access to judicial proceedings”); United States v. [read post]
