Search for: "Superior Court of California"
Results 6221 - 6240
of 10,170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2011, 7:10 am
The lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of California. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
The Sacramento Superior Court granted the motion finding plaintiff failed to submit sufficient facts to establish either cause action. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Superior Court, no. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
In his lawsuit filed in the Orange County Superior Court, the man now alleges that McDonald’s served coffee at “extremely unsafe” temperatures and used defective cup lids. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 6:40 pm
These principles have now been applied by the Ontario Superior Court in California Kitchens with respect to the duty to defend, and by the British Columbia Court of Appeal in Bulldog Bag with respect to the duty to indemnify. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 8:45 am
The SJS lawsuit was filed in 2008 and has faced a lengthy battle through a number of courts before trial began in August in Los Angeles Superior Court. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 10:37 am
Superior Court case -- November 8, 2011. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 9:37 am
Superior Court case — November 8, 2011. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:04 am
Superior Court (Hohnbaum, et al., real parties in interest) on November 8, 2011, according to the Court docket issued recently. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 7:09 am
Honda had previously asked the Superior Court to move the case to Montana, which was denied. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:06 am
In Brown, the first of The Ralphs Cases, the California Court of Appeal held Concepcion inapplicable to representative claims under PAGA, the California Labor Code’s Private Attorneys General Act. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:11 pm
The ruling, issued by San Diego Superior Court Judge Jeffrey S. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 7:02 pm
Superior Court, on November 8, 2011. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
”[21] The Panel explains that this formulation is desirable because it will provide the courts and litigants with notice of appropriate uses of the legislation, and by doing so, it will deter litigation that does not fall within the appropriate uses.[22] As well, a purpose clause will help litigants differentiate between SLAPPs and non-SLAPPs, the latter of which is subject to the limited remedies for traditional civil actions.[23] An effective purpose clause plays the crucial roles… [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 4:30 pm
Superior Court for November 8, 2011. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:28 pm
Just two months later, on October 22, 2008, the California Supreme Court granted the plaintiff's petition for review of the Court of Appeal's decision in Brinker. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
Superior Court, 36 Cal.4th 148 (Cal. 2005). [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:58 pm
The supervising Los Angeles Superior Court permitted approximately 600 “hardship” claimants to petition for and receive continuation of full scheduled payments. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
[4] Discussion of the Superior Court ruling can be found here [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:47 am
[4] Discussion of the Superior Court ruling can be found here [read post]
