Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 6221 - 6240
of 9,109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2012, 10:20 am
Farms' property above 566 feet became entitled for high density, mixed-use residential, commercial, office and industrial uses. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:30 am
" Granting CSEA’s petition, the court order the City “to credit two hours to [the employee’s] sick leave accruals [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Judge Nevin Dawson, who granted Dotcom bail in February, will be taking over the case. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:59 am
V. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:01 pm
See R. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:14 am
The case is Maryland v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 5:12 am
Graham v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:41 pm
For example, Jules Verne, an astonishingly imaginative author, wrote in the mid-19th century about fantastical things that we now take for granted such as electric submarines, newscasts, tasers, skywriting and videoconferencing. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:09 pm
Eisentrager and United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:02 am
96/09 P Anheuser-Busch v Bud? [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:56 pm
In considering his argument, the courted noted that in People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:54 am
Boring v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:31 am
Boring v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
It appears that the District Court interpreted the Seagate opinion to hold that the exculpatory opinion of counsel could not be used to determine the level of enhanced damages. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am
The case is interesting also at a political level. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am
Here are the questions I've put together for teaching The Health Care Cases, NFIB v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:24 am
He has represented clients in both state and federal courts, and at the appellate level. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:18 pm
The case of Windsor v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 12:13 pm
FAPL v QC Leisure [2008] EWHC 1411 (Ch) and ITV v TV Catchup [2011] EWHC 1874 (Pat)). [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
"FOIL is to be liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly interpreted so that the public is granted maximum access to the records of government" (Capital Newspapers v Whalen, 69 NY2d 246, 252; see Buffalo News, Inc. v Buffalo Enterprise Dev. [read post]
