Search for: "United States v. Robert" Results 6221 - 6240 of 9,871
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2013, 8:54 am by Amanda Frost
Service Employees International Union, Local 1000 (public sector union fees); and United States v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:00 am by Deborah Schander
Judges who like to rhyme: United States v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:09 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
These questions have not been clearly resolved in this particular context under United States law. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:00 am by Robert Chesney
That is, Congress should state explicitly that detention authority under the AUMF and the NDAA does not extend to any persons captured within the territory of the United States. [read post]
16 May 2013, 2:00 pm by Alan Rozenshtein
Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) stated that “the actions of the department have in fact impaired the First Amendment. [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:05 am by Susan Brenner
The opinion explains that while Robertstates that he was a co-owner of the account and continued to access the account from time to time”,  he “had not accessed the account for some period before John's death and had forgotten the password. [read post]
14 May 2013, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
  An arrest is a “seizure” for Fourth Amendment purposes, but under a case called United States v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am by Cormac Early
United States, a challenge to the constitutionality of court-martial jurisdiction over a civilian contractor. [read post]
10 May 2013, 4:34 pm by Andrew F. Sellars
 A 1989 Ninth Circuit case and a 2012 Ninth Circuit case reapplied the doctrine to later dissemination of technical data to foreign powers; these cases analyzed the application of the law under United States v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm by Ronald Collins
I’d contrast my view, for example, with Toobin’s view of Chief Justice John Roberts in Citizens United. [read post]
10 May 2013, 9:42 am by Florian Mueller
The Florida case is a rare exception in which a delay is convenient for Apple.The next Apple-Google trial in the United States is now (absent another rescheduling) going to be held in October 2013. [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:29 am by Jon Hyman
Conventional wisdom says that the current iteration of the United States Supreme Court is pro-business. [read post]
7 May 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
  Although RFRA was held unconstitutional as applied to state and local governments in the 1997 case of City of Boerne v. [read post]