Search for: "A B"
Results 6241 - 6260
of 158,459
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2023, 6:11 pm
It is a Class B misdemeanor and punishable by up to 6 months in county prison if the damages exceed $200. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:29 pm
From the statute: (1) (A)Any person who— (i) knowing that a person is an alien, brings to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever such person at a place other than a designated port of entry or place other than as designated by the Commissioner, regardless of whether such alien has received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States and regardless of any future official action which may… [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:25 pm
In this post, I want to focus on the trans-Tasman element of the case – and, in particular, the interpretation of s 26(1)(b) of the Australian Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:02 pm
Our client is a naturalized US citizen and her mother came to the United States in December 2018 with a B-2 visitor’s visa from Albania. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
Oh Mickey, you’re so fine—but you’re not alone: An avalanche of copyrighted works will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2024. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm
James B. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 1:42 pm
Representing the federal government, Deputy Solicitor General Curtis Gannon told the justices that the releases for the Sacklers go beyond what Section 1123(b)(6) allows. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 12:47 pm
Roberts noted O’Connor’s roots on the Lazy B ranch in Arizona, and that she was born in El Paso, Texas, in 1930, “only because that was the closest full hospital to Lazy B, a mere four hours by train. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 11:55 am
” “This action exposes one of the highest-reaching and longest-lasting infiltrations of the United States government by a foreign agent,” said Attorney General Merrick B. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 11:26 am
[More than you might think—and it’s getting better all the time.] [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:55 am
by Andrew Dang, 3L Student, Stanford Law School The emergence of Chat-GPT on November 30, 2022, presented businesses with a critical question: how much should they rely on Generative AI? [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:43 am
The appointment comes after an extensive search following the retirement of Chancellor Emeritus James B. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:35 am
In the context of a negligence case, if a driver is engaged in exempt conduct under § 1104(b) during emergency operations, the reckless disregard standard applies. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:28 am
§ 922(g)(8), which provides: It shall be unlawful for any person[ ] who is subject to a court order that[:] (A) was issued after a hearing of which such person received actual notice, and at which such person had an opportunity to participate; (B) restrains such person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner of such person or child of such intimate partner or person, or engaging in other conduct that would place an intimate partner in reasonable fear of bodily… [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:22 am
California, SOC dissented because (a) she chose to vote despite likely continuing conflicts of interest and (b) of course she did. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:10 am
The EUIPO issued a refusal of the IR based on lack of distinctiveness (Art. 7(1)(b) EUTMR). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 8:33 am
Matter of M-R-M-S-, 28 I&N Dec. 757 (BIA 2023) - If a persecutor is targeting members of a certain family as a means of achieving some other ultimate goal unrelated to the protected ground, family membership is incidental or subordinate to that other ultimate goal and therefore not one central reason for the harm. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 8:23 am
USA v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
The Court of Appeal therefore disagreed with Mr Justice Jay’s finding that Mrs Potter could not rely on the LA 1980, s 32(1)(b). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:30 am
As to the three FOIL requests at issue in this action, NCPD had withheld all documents relating to complaints that were not determined to be substantiated on the ground that such documents were categorically exempt from disclosure as an "unwarranted invasion of personal privacy" pursuant to Public Officers Law §87(2)(b).The Appellate Division opined that "records concerning unsubstantiated complaints or allegations of misconduct are not categorically exempt from… [read post]
