Search for: "BEENE v. BEENE" Results 6241 - 6260 of 191,925
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2013, 9:29 am by constitutional lawblogger
While the trial of famous whistleblower Bradley Manning continues and the fate of even-more-famous whistleblower Edward Snowden remains unresolved, two other government employee whistleblowers involved in high profile cases have been terminated from employment and possibly implicate Garcetti v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 7:37 pm
Here's the abstract:Regulatory takings has long been considered one of the more confused areas... [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Ann Lipton
In recent years, and particularly since the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 7:50 am by Nonprofit Blogger
The US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina determined in Rosenstock v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 11:38 am by Lrwprofs
The 2012 Green Bag list of exemplary legal writing has just been published. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 6:04 am by Legal Profession Prof
Lee, the Court noted that Lee has been suspended five times, four for failing to register... [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 7:21 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which includes links to papers: Cavazos v. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 9:25 am
The TaxProfBlog has been tracking media coverage of the case and keeping a running... [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:00 am by Paul Caron
Conor Clarke (Washington University; Google Scholar), Moore: The Overlooked Excise Power, 181 Tax Notes Fed. 1759 (Dec. 4, 2023): Moore v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 4:51 pm by constitutional lawblogger
A broad statute banning persons convicted of certain sex offenses from accessing "social media" has been held unconstitutionally overbroad under the First Amendment in Doe v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 10:56 pm by Simon Gibbs
The recent costs management case of CIP Properties (AIPT) Ltd v Galliford Try Infrastructure Ltd & Ors (Costs No. 2) [2015] EWHC 481 (TCC) has been widely reported as an example of the court “slashing” the claimant’s excessive costs budget. [read post]