Search for: "Davis v. Davis"
Results 6241 - 6260
of 8,260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2012, 10:52 am
Several Justices noted that when the constitutionality of the Social Security Act was challenged 75 years ago in Helvering v Davis, the government waived application of the Anti-Injunction Act, something it could not do if the Act were a jurisdictional bar. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 5:17 pm
The elaboration that "the intent of a questioner is relevant only if it could affect a reasonable declarant's expectations" is, I think, the best way of making sense of a rather confusing aspect of the opinion in Davis v. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 8:25 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 8:39 am
A recent ruling by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Lemmon v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
” The challengers in California v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 2:51 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:51 am
Davis Security, Inc., 217 F.Supp.2d 1224, 1228 (D.Utah 2002) (dismissing the plaintiff’s common law claims as “merely duplicative” of her FLSA claim); see also Anderson v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 11:36 am
But the contrast with the earlier case of Contractreal Ltd v Davies (2001) EWCA Civ 928 was resolveable. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
In Rucho v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:36 pm
In Holder v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am
The Supreme Court has wrestled with the concept of how much partisanship is too much since first finding partisan-gerrymandering claims justiciable in Davis v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
GUNDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
” Yet the Supreme Court, ignoring this rather obvious reality, chose to hold, in Davis v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
In the first four parts of our series on the California v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 10:54 am
Darbishire, [1920] A.C. 581, 604 (P.C.)); see also Davis, 1 F.3d at 609; In re Feldberg, 862 F.2d 622, 625 (7th Cir.1988). [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm
S. 573 (1986); and Baldwin v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 am
Timothy Davis v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm
3 and 4 December 2013 (Nicola Davies J). [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:43 pm
Davis 17-6883 Issue: Whether—when the U.S. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Inasmuch as the Attorney General's office was not an agency involved in the FOIL request, and is without authority to grant relief requested by petitioner, the Attorney General is not a proper party herein (see Matter of Davis v Evans, 97 AD3d 857, 858 [3d Dept 2012]; Matter of Abreu v Hogan, 72 AD3d 1143, 1144 [3d Dept 2010], appeal dismissed 15 NY3d 836 [2010]). [read post]
