Search for: "Doe, Appeal of" Results 6241 - 6260 of 108,012
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2023, 5:02 pm by Arthur F. Coon
CJUF Smart Corner LLC (2021) 64 Cal.App.5th 439, 465-466), it does not preclude the Legislature from amending a statute and applying the amended statute to both pending and future cases, including applying it to cases still pending on appeal. [read post]
30 May 2023, 1:28 pm by Cole K. Waldhauser
The trial court found for the owner and the court of appeal affirmed, reasoning that the term “disclose” requires “the revelation of something new. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:57 pm by Sophia Cope
If the case is appealed to the Second Circuit, we urge the appellate court to affirm this landmark decision. [read post]
30 May 2023, 11:19 am by Patricia Hughes
In these cases, the review does not proceed to section 1 where the government has the onus to show the infringement is justified. [read post]
30 May 2023, 10:15 am by Guest Author
Thus, the current state of law appears to be that a court must set aside a rule as procedurally invalid if the agency does not adequately consider and respond to significant public comments. [read post]
30 May 2023, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
According to the Court, “[t]he ordinary statutory review scheme does not preclude a district court from entertaining these extraordinary claims. [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Index No. 160234/22 Appeal No. 291 Case No. 2023-00232 [*1]MargaretAnn Bianculli etc. et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v The City of New York Office of Labor Relations et al., Defendants-Appellants. [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Index No. 160234/22 Appeal No. 291 Case No. 2023-00232 [*1]MargaretAnn Bianculli etc. et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v The City of New York Office of Labor Relations et al., Defendants-Appellants. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:00 am by Anna Maria Stein
Therefore the Court concludes that it does not enjoy protection as a collective trade mark. [read post]
29 May 2023, 11:24 pm by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
For the reasons previously explained by the Paris Appeal Court, the use of songs in a musical box does affect the author’s integrity right and thus it requires prior authorisation.Beyond the immediate relevance this ruling has for Trenet’s legacy, this Kat also wonders whether moral rights have been cleared for other musical boxes in those numerous Paris shops? [read post]
29 May 2023, 11:43 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
While the start of the Unitary Patent system will celebrated tomorrow at the UPC in Luxembourg and on Thursday with the EPO event “Welcoming the Unitary Patent System – A new era for innovation in Europe”, tomorrow also a conference will be held in Brussels (4.30 – 6.30 pm) with a distinctly more critical title: The Unitary Patent Package: a start on shaky tracks? [read post]
29 May 2023, 10:00 am by Robert Liles
This article does not cover the appeal of denied pre-service claims by providers and beneficiaries.[21] In contrast to pre-service claims which have yet to be performed, post-service claims have already been performed by a provider. [read post]