Search for: "Fields v. A S" Results 6241 - 6260 of 17,272
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2016, 2:33 pm
 Judge Kara Stoll agreed explaining that at certain points in her career she had to make decisions about what path she wanted to pursue - litigation v prosecution, district v appellate work - and that required active decision making. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 4:14 pm by John J. Sullivan
  After first precluding defendants from informally contacting plaintiffs’ treating physicians – ordinarily allowed under Stempler v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
That broadening has made it possible to offer the course not just to first year law students, but also to graduate students in the social sciences and in international affairs, as a grounding in the legal systems that are important in their respective fields. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
But Crosbie lost his case because, after careful consideration of a chaplain’s role in the field of battle, Nicol J concluded that a person in such a position acts as a lightning conductor of the unit’s mood, a receiver of confidences,  and a communicator of  grievances to the commanding officers. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 5:59 am by Terry Hart
Aereo,5American Broadcasting Co. v Aereo, 134 S.Ct. 2498 (2014) (“In Aereo’s view, it does not perform. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm
Referring to Lord Sumption’s opinion in Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd [2013] UKSC 34, para 8) he observed that there is nothing wrong in principle with a sole director and shareholder causing a company to incur a liability and maintain that that liability is exclusively that of the company, not the individual. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:28 am by war
Wright Rubber Products Pty Ltd v Bayer AG [2010] FCAFC 85 [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 12:01 pm by Karen Hoffmann
The Journal is seeking submissions for this volume: This special issue will bridge the Journal’s storied history with its bright future. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:07 am by Dennis Crouch
(1) whether the art is from the same field of endeavor, regardless of the problem addressed and, (2) if the reference is not within the field of the inventor's endeavor, whether the reference still is reasonably pertinent to the particular problem with which the inventor is involved. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:42 pm by Giles Peaker
Ali v Birmingham CC (our report here) had held that a s.204 appeal was not a determination of a civil right, such that article 6(1) ECHR. [read post]