Search for: "Gaines v. State"
Results 6241 - 6260
of 9,739
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
As the English Court of Appeal noted in its 2008 judgment in Research in Motion UK Ltd v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 11:43 pm
From 1921 in Adkins v. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 9:59 am
” * Sacchi v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 1:02 pm
See Malpas v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:19 am
Quattrocchi (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) TTAB finds SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION merely descriptive of marketing services (TTABlog) Trademark holder not entitled to domain name registered years before: National Arbitration Forum decision in Arizona State Trailer Sales, Inc. d/b/a Little Dealer Little Prices RV v. [read post]
3 May 2008, 9:28 am
This is not unlike the personal computer that the defendant in United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:43 am
“The Lounge has been in operation since 1964 and has gained regional fame by hosting many entertainment and athletic events. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:13 am
Several states have laws that protect off-duty conduct, although it is unclear whether they apply to off-duty communications. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:16 am
Boshears v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 12:55 pm
In a ruling that is being hailed as a victory for web scrapers and the open nature of publicly available website data, the Ninth Circuit today issued its long-awaited opinion in hiQ Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 10:59 am
(United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am
Excise taxes on rental cars are levied at the state-level in 44 states. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:16 pm
Related Issues: PrivacyCALEAEncrypting the WebLaw Enforcement AccessSecurityRelated Cases: Bernstein v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 3:30 am
CANON V. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 6:53 am
Moreover, the rules of the Office of the Federal Register state that formal approval is required to incorporate materials by reference.Alpine notes here that the district court also failed to consider and apply Kisor v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 10:43 pm
I recommend to the people I know in the Apple fan community who would like to see draconian remedies imposed on Samsung for Apple's competitive gain beyond what is warranted by its inventive contributions to the state of the art (I just borrowed language from a Federal Circuit ruling recently quoted by Judge Koh in Apple v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 12:38 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 3:07 am
This blog has repeatedly been referenced in court filings, even in an Acer v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 2:45 am
, here, in which she gave a full and instructive analysis of the decision of Mr Justice Edwards-Stuart in Fairstar Heavy Transport N V v Adkins and another (here) that Fairstar did not have a proprietary right in emails sent to it but effectively hijacked by Adkins so that Fairstar could not gain access to them in order to read them. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 8:42 am
Kenneth continued the "Trademarks and Designs" overlap by giving an explanation of trade dress and product configuration in the United States. [read post]
