Search for: "H. C"
Results 6241 - 6260
of 12,407
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2010, 1:00 pm
Comptroller Liu credited H. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) The most-consulted French-language decision was J.M. c. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 9:31 am
O entendimento foi pacificado pela Corte Especial do Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) em mais um julgamento realizado sob o rito do recurso repetitivo (artigo 543-C do Código de Processo Civil), o que firma a tese para as demais instâncias da Justiça brasileira. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 4:08 pm
Segundo o advogado, há pelo menos cem pessoas que praticaram a mesma conduta de Antônio Lamas e não foram denunciadas. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:30 am
Si ces règles vous paraissent confuses, n’hésitez pas à contacter un avocat dont le champ d’activité est la fiscalité, comme ceux du cabinet Boyer Law Firm, qui se fera un plaisir de vous apporter son aide. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:56 pm
In determining the parent-time schedule and allocating the transportation costs, the court shall consider: (a) the reason for the parent’s relocation; (b) the additional costs or difficulty to both parents in exercising parent-time; (c) the economic resources of both parents; and (d) other factors the court considers necessary and relevant. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 2:32 am
That is for in order to obtain a temporary residence permit the same requirements are set.The right to permanent residence in the Republic of Moldova may be granted to a foreigner - the holder of the right to temporary residence if s/he meets all of the following conditions:a) has stayed legally and continuously in the Republic of Moldova under the right of temporary residence for at least 3 years - for foreigners married to Moldovan citizens (or 5 years, if the duration of the marriage is less… [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 6:20 am
(C) - Yes Evans, Elease (V) - Yes Dancer, Ronald S. - Yes DeAngelo, Wayne P. - Yes Doherty, Michael J. - Yes Oliver, Sheila Y. - Yes Quijano, Annette - Yes Scalera, Frederick - Yes Webber, Jay - Yes Session Voting: Asm. 5/21/2009 - 3RDG FINAL PASSAGE - Yes {76} No {0} Not Voting {4} Abstains {0} - Roll Call Addiego, Dawn Marie - Yes Albano, Nelson T. - Yes Amodeo, John F. - Yes Angelini, Mary Pat - Yes Barnes, Peter J., III - Yes Biondi, Peter J. - Yes Bramnick, Jon M. - Yes Burzichelli,… [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 9:40 am
Labor Code section 1198.5(c)(1). 3. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 6:28 am
Estos reportes fueron elaborados en base a un cuestionario uniforme que estaba dividido en las siguientes secciones: (A) The Contracting State and the New York Convention; (B) National sources of law; (C) Limitation periods (time limits); (D) National courts and court proceedings; (E) Evidence required; (F) Stay of enforcement; (G) Confidentiality; and (H) Other issues. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 1:02 am
John C. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 1:59 pm
According to the Resource Agency, on February 29, 2012, it released the following preliminary drafts of the following for public consideration and (informal) comment: BDCP Chapters and Effects Analysis (DRAFT) Chapter 3 – Conservation Strategy Chapter 5 – Effects Analysis Chapter 8 – Implementation Costs and Funding Sources Effects Analysis - Technical Appendix (Construction Effects on Covered Fish) BDCP EIR/EIS Chapters (DRAFT) Chapter 5 - Water Supply … [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 11:10 pm
¿Cómo funciona esto? [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 10:25 am
Last week, the House passed H. [read post]
25 Nov 2006, 9:33 am
Sec 2254 should be eliminated in capital cases for guilt phase issues alone;(B) the gatekeeper provisions of 28 U.S.C. 2244 should be returned to the pre-AEDPA standards; and(C.) federal habeas procedural default should be eliminated for all capital case guilt phase claims that are related to innocence.Regardless of repeal of the AEDPA, over the long haul:(A) set basic minimum standards for all capital cases, in states that do not meet these minimum qualifications permit removal of the… [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 9:11 pm
See points A, and C. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 4:56 am
§ 411.24(h). [read post]
21 May 2018, 4:12 am
But one of the most interesting cases I’ve seen on the subject differentiated between different types of profanity (h/t Ohio Employer’s Law Blog for the original cite to this case) and came out of the 11th Circuit early this decade. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 9:03 am
” The statute does not cover: (a) any wire or oral communication; (b) any communication made through a tone-only paging device; or (c) any communication from a tracking device. [read post]
