Search for: "HOPE v. STATE" Results 6241 - 6260 of 14,628
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2010, 7:37 am by On the Net
  Let’s hope the ACLU takes his case. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 5:14 am by Dianne Saxe
Madam Justice Healey slammed lax legislative standards for tanks, noting that the regulation itself clearly did not protect against  potential harm, and stating (at para 34) that she hoped “that this judgment will find its way into the hands of the regulators of this industry given the potential for environmental harm if the specifications for such tanks are not changed to better guard against corrosion by MIC. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[Ira Stoll, more] “Returning to Common-Law Principles of Insider Trading After United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 10:29 am
In other words, the paradigm case for the Roberts Court's restriction of the spending power is likely to be not United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 2:45 pm
Ice, which deals with Blakely's applicability to consecutive sentencing determinations, and United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:28 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Pity the docket and courtroom clerks at the United States District Court for the Central District of California, who are trying not to confuse separate Barry Diller and BarryDriller lawsuits.A little more than a week after a copyright and trademark infringement suit, Fox Television Services, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 3:58 pm
Case in point, courtesy of Eugene Volokh: a Ninth Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 2:47 pm by joel
  Most importantly, for the corporate onlookers hoping to avoid such legal disputes, companies should establish corporate policies that clearly state that any social media accounts used at the workplace on behalf of the company are property of the business, not its user [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 06460 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that Family Court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction in this family offense proceeding notwithstanding that the offenses occurred out of state (see Opportune N. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 9:11 am by John Duffy
First, while some of the dissent is a reiteration of complaints Gorsuch raised in his dissent two years ago in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]