Search for: "Husband v. Wife"
Results 6241 - 6260
of 6,703
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2008, 4:41 pm
Similarly, an Illinois court held that threatening divorce to induce a philandering husband to agree to convey the marital residence to the wife should the husband stray again did not invalidate the agreement. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 11:17 am
Gac and Newburgh v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 1:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 10:49 am
Perez is a car accident case wherein a wife and husband were awarded $54,000 and $24,000, respectively, by an Anchorage, Alaska jury. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 10:49 am
Perez is a car accident case wherein a wife and husband were awarded $54,000 and $24,000, respectively, by an Anchorage, Alaska jury. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 11:10 am
Ade (NFP) - "Edmund Ade ("Husband") appeals from the trial court's dissolution decree which ended his marriage to JoAnn Ade ("Wife"). [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 3:35 am
Casewell v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Court of Appeal “The payment of an allowance to a disabled wife to pay for carer service was part of the husband's income for assessing his income support if he was that carer. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 3:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 1:59 pm
In the case of Julie Greely v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 3:00 am
Doerr v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 1:30 am
Case Name: Jasper v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 1:30 am
Case Name: Jasper v. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 3:50 am
In Patel v. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:34 pm
McCain, 125 Fla. 840, 170 So. 323, 325 (Fla.1936) (holding husband and wife may hold life estates as tenants by the entireties). [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 10:44 pm
Unfortunately, the wife, M.D., was unable to bear children. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:50 pm
CMI Capital v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:26 pm
We therefore remand this cause to the trial court with instructions to include all marital assets and liabilities in the marital pot, including the property owned by Husband and Wife before the marriage and the medical bills incurred by Wife and her children during the marriage, but excluding Husband's August 2006 profit sharing check. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:04 pm
Applying this authority, the court properly held that plaintiff was entitled to recoup 50% of marital funds used to meet the husband's separate legal obligations to his former wife. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:04 pm
Applying this authority, the court properly held that plaintiff was entitled to recoup 50% of marital funds used to meet the husband's separate legal obligations to his former wife. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 11:28 am
Johnson et., al., v. [read post]
