Search for: "In Re L." Results 6241 - 6260 of 22,396
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2024, 4:45 am
TTABlog comment:  Any predictions Text Copyright John L. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 3:02 am
Schechter participated only in dilution’s initial decade, but his insistence on a re-analysis of trademark functions set the pattern for its re-emergence, and dilution’s history confirms Schechter’s organic view of trademark law. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Décision Les motifs du jugement revêtent une importance particulière lorsque le juge du procès doit démêler des éléments de preuve contradictoires portant sur une question clé. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
If you’re reading this blog, then you had a better Ides of March than Julius Caesar did in 44 B.C.E. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 4:34 pm
L’affaire Oasis permet de mettre en lumière une certaine confusion sur le choix du nom de la société, le rôle du nom et sa protection. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
"The PTO having satisfied all four elements of the Buffett test, the Board affirmed the refusal to register.TTABlog note: For other recent Section 2(a) false connection cases involving tobacco-related products and Indian tribes, see In re White, cited above [TTABlogged here]: In re Shinnecock Smoke Shop, Serial Nos. 78918061 and 78918500 (September 10, 2008) [not precedential] [TTABlogged here]; and In re WM Distribution Inc., Serial No. 78195284 (October 13, 2005)… [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 6:33 am
"Experiencing car troubles in an unfamiliar location can be a stressful situation," said Marshall L. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 6:12 pm
"In sum, the Board affirmed the refusal to register.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 6:51 am by becassidy
When you’re quoting a case or other source, sometimes you want to leave out some words. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 8:29 am
The grandly-named Franck Latrémolière (partner, Reckon LLP, right) has come gallantly to the IPKat's rescue with some explanation of yesterday's Court of First Instance ruling in Case T-229/05 AEPI v The Commission (see post here). [read post]