Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 6241 - 6260 of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2017, 7:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Mar. 30, 2017)Some mention of my previous blogging on the issue, but that doesn’t matter to the ultimate result (though the court at least notices the incontestability problem). [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 8:13 am
  Adding "asserts truth of matter asserted" or "X is testifying about what Y said" wouldn't really add much, would it? [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:52 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The Court succinctly summarised the matter as "generally, on a fair reading of ss. 15(1)(b) and 15(1)(c), a patent can be granted to a legal person for an invention with an artificial intelligence system or device as the inventor".Ultimately what the case focused on is whether a valid patent application has been made, rather than who will own any patent that might be granted in the future. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 12:24 am by Florian Mueller
It doesn't matter whether so-called behavioral remedies are presently en vogue in other places, especially when a long-term license is pretty structural.Even the FTC may change mind. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:52 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The Court succinctly summarised the matter as "generally, on a fair reading of ss. 15(1)(b) and 15(1)(c), a patent can be granted to a legal person for an invention with an artificial intelligence system or device as the inventor".Ultimately what the case focused on is whether a valid patent application has been made, rather than who will own any patent that might be granted in the future. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:52 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The Court succinctly summarised the matter as "generally, on a fair reading of ss. 15(1)(b) and 15(1)(c), a patent can be granted to a legal person for an invention with an artificial intelligence system or device as the inventor".Ultimately what the case focused on is whether a valid patent application has been made, rather than who will own any patent that might be granted in the future. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:52 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The Court succinctly summarised the matter as "generally, on a fair reading of ss. 15(1)(b) and 15(1)(c), a patent can be granted to a legal person for an invention with an artificial intelligence system or device as the inventor".Ultimately what the case focused on is whether a valid patent application has been made, rather than who will own any patent that might be granted in the future. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 4:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The court here wasn’t persuaded by them. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 1:02 am
We spent a year being given A and B, with the objective of getting to C, and you're telling us we have A and want to get to C and are asking us what we need to get there. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:17 am by Tom Goldstein
 I don’t think there is any evidence that Kagan necessarily disagrees with the idea that she would recuse if she personally participated in a case in any material way, without regard to whether she was counsel of record. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 11:50 am by Chuck Ramsay
  Practically speaking, however, the source code coalition has prepared matters to point where it requires little effort from attorneys to take advantage of this issue. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
I have changed my view on the matter not from a desire to single out any of the counsel involved. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 2:08 pm
  At some point,  shouldn't school board members prove capable of taking sound legal advice, and school board attorneys prove capable of giving it? [read post]