Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 6241 - 6260
of 70,962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2009, 4:59 am
The IPKat has just received an innocent question from his friend Kristof Neefs (Altius): did the normally-vigilant Kat miss Case C-62/08 UDV North America v Brandtraders NV, an Order of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 19 February. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 5:30 pm
Maker’s Mark prevails in “handmade” false advertising suit – San Antonio lawyer Saul Perloff of Norton Rose Fulbright on The Brand Protection Blog Under Armour Protects Jordan Spieth Investment with Trademarks - Nashville lawyer Kevin Hartley of Trust Tree on their blog, The Root Falls From Heights — A Deadly Workplace Hazard That Is Easily Preventable – Hunstville lawyer Jeff Blackwell of Hornsby, Watson, Hornsby, Blackwell on his blog,… [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:22 am
Would you have refused registration in this case? [read post]
9 May 2019, 10:49 am
The fundamental question in trademark infringement cases is whether “consumers would likely confuse the alleged infringer’s mark with the asserted mark. [read post]
5 May 2010, 2:33 am
In any case, Applicant did not provide revenue figures for the USA alone,and so it may be that Applicant has not made significant use of its mark in this country.Finally, the Board looked to the 13th du Pont factor: "Any other factor probative of the effect of use. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:37 am
The mixed record in this case leaves us with doubt about whether applicant’s mark gives “offense to the conscience or moral feelings” or is “shocking to the sense of decency or propriety” in the minds of a substantial composite of Americans. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 3:56 pm
It was not clearly established whether the employee had any upcoming interviews, although none was marked in his work calendar. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 7:20 am
In the recent case (McClusky v. [read post]
6 Oct 2006, 8:42 am
" It is therefore necessary to determine whether an actual case or controversy exists. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 3:07 am
After yet so many decisions denying trademark protection for slogans in Germany, the Federal Patent Court in Germany recently allowed registration of the slogan mark “Who stops you” (decision of the Federal Patent Court in Case 29 W (pat) 523/21). [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:56 am
Descriptive uses of a mark on the trademark owner’s website can be a disadvantage at the time of defending the mark from invalidation! [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:56 am
Descriptive uses of a mark on the trademark owner’s website can be a disadvantage at the time of defending the mark from invalidation! [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 8:04 am
The Court found the actual attachment of sandbanks to the foreshore itself happened ‘at one moment’, unlike the shifting of the low tide mark which will normally be gradual. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:40 am
But in case you aren't so lucky, here are some helpful tips from OTC Safety regarding over the counter medicines for your little ones: - Remember that you should never give cough/cold medicine to children under 4. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 7:11 pm
The primary issue in this case is likelihood of confusion. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 6:41 am
The 7th Circuit contrasted this case with a prior case involving Gatorade's use of another company's trade mark as part of a slogan, Sands, Taylor & Wood Co. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 1:13 pm
Workplace Prof Blog has an analysis of today's argument in the union fees cases here, while the AP's Mark Sherman has a report here [via Rick Hasen]. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:07 am
Mark Miller at EndUserSharePoint.com has been running with my idea of using separate pages in a Sharepoint area to host a collection of user support documentation: Pages and Sites in SharePoint 2007 (Case Study).He has turned that into a screen cast using an alternative method of organizing the documents using content types: A Beginner's Guide to Content Types. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 6:13 pm
"As to the third-party uses and registrations, the Board noted that they cover "a broad array of goods, many of which are wholly unrelated, and, therefore, no conclusion can be drawn as to the realtionship between the goods in issue in this case. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 8:00 am
” Yet, “the existence of some -- but not substantial -- similarity between the subject marks may be sufficient in some cases to demonstrate a likelihood of dilution . . . . [read post]
