Search for: "Mark Harms"
Results 6241 - 6260
of 10,422
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2014, 8:59 pm
Their tragic deaths mark the third fatal shooting at this complex in under two years. [read post]
19 May 2014, 5:00 am
The court stated that “Fees can serve regulatory purposes in two ways: either by discouraging particular conduct through the device of making it more costly, or by generating income ear marked to cover the cost of regulation. [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:04 pm
That is hardly a wise justification for legislation that is certain to cause far-reaching harm to businesses especially Canadian businesses. [read post]
16 May 2014, 7:37 am
Instead, RAP4's use of its competitor's name, is a merely a wholly permissible nominative use of that mark. [read post]
15 May 2014, 7:01 am
Townsend, 557 U.S. 404, 417 (2009) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
13 May 2014, 1:34 pm
If so, that would do real harm to the causal story Bruner is telling. [read post]
13 May 2014, 12:58 pm
The mere creation of email accounts that are not used does no substantial harm to anyone. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:23 am
It is interesting to note that the same interpretation was provided with regard to Article 24(4) of Regulation (EU) No 125/2012: regardless of the domicile of the parties, the courts of the Member State in which the deposit or registration has been applied for, has taken place or is under the terms of an instrument of the Union or an international convention deemed to have taken place have the exclusive jurisdiction to hear “proceedings concerned with the registration or… [read post]
13 May 2014, 7:31 am
Marty wants the Redskins mark to be renounced because it is racist, while this Kat's contention is that its owners should kiss it goodbye regardless whether it is offensive or not: assuming the brand was never intended to cause offence, its value of an asset has been deeply harmed by the perception on the part of a substantial segment of the public that it is racist -- and this Kat doubts whether the trade mark owner will ever be in a position to shift this… [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:00 am
Alvare, A 'Bare…Purpose to Harm'? [read post]
11 May 2014, 10:20 pm
Banner waving and chanting against the change also marked opposition tactics during the meeting. [read post]
11 May 2014, 4:29 am
She’s done this to everyone who has challenged her, Marc Randazza, Lee Rowland, Mark Bennett, Time Cushing, Mike Masnick and, of course, me. [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:24 am
Because foreign editions may have different content and publication quality, plaintiffs are concerned that sales of one masquerading as the other will result in harm to their goodwill and reputation. [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:02 am
These marks do not look alike at all. [read post]
8 May 2014, 10:37 pm
According to Starr, the decision marked “a fundamental paradigm shift with respect to the relationship between universities and their student-athletes. [read post]
8 May 2014, 1:42 pm
Fortunately, at least one federal judge has recognized that such suits are off the mark. [read post]
8 May 2014, 11:33 am
But I do sometimes skim it for copyright articles, and today my eye was caught by an op-ed piece from Mark Herring of Winthrop University about the Google Books decision. [read post]
8 May 2014, 5:00 am
The last opinion available on Lexis or Westlaw for Seavey v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:46 am
In a New York Times op-ed. former AUSA turned Minnesota lawprof Mark Osler did a mitzvah by explaining the game played in drug sentencing. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:19 pm
The Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 marked dramatic progress in the federal government’s efforts to protect Americans from dangerous pesticides. [read post]
