Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 6241 - 6260
of 21,693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2017, 10:20 am
This was the subject of an interim decision of Roth J. earlier this month in the Competition Appeal Tribunal: Secretary of State for Health and Others v Servier Laboratories Limited and Others [2017] EWHC 2006 (Ch) -- IPKat's Eibhlin Vardy has made a detailed summary for you.And the weekly routine, Around the IP blogs! [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 10:30 am
USA: Skidmore v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 3:14 am
Kate Spade LLC v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:06 am
Jae Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 3:24 pm
Well, the California Supreme Court finally released its opinion in Ross v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 6:21 am
(quoting 435 U.S. at 295-96 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)). [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 12:41 pm
Todd Gaziano and Reed Hopper for Town Hall preview United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm
Reading the Fourth Circuit’s en banc opinion in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 11:42 am
AmBrit, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 8:36 am
Somoza v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:23 am
Lee Holding Co., 471 F.3d 6, 11 (1st Cir.2006) (quoting United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 7:14 am
The wonderfully-named case of Mighty Men of God v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 10:00 am
"The Appellate Term, 2nd and 11th Judicial Districts, believed so and in Chavez v. 407 Seventh Ave. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 11:50 am
Louis Vuitton wasn't happy, and brought an action for trade mark infringement, trade mark infringement and dilution. [read post]
24 Nov 2007, 6:02 pm
District Court for the District of Maryland (source: Justia), this one captioned Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 12:54 pm
But, today, in Sykes v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 12:32 pm
But, today, in Sykes v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:29 am
In Luri v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:39 am
* Nestlé v Cadbury: on mixing and matching grounds for exclusion under Article 3(1)(e) Trade Marks DirectiveBack again on the KitKat dispute pending before the CJEU (on which see here, here, here, and here), Mark further reflects upon Attorney General Wathelet's opinion on the second question, which is "Where a shape consists of three essential features, one of which results from the nature of the goods themselves… [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
United States v. [read post]
