Search for: "May v. State" Results 6241 - 6260 of 119,555
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2011, 5:03 pm by Ilya Somin
(Ilya Somin) For DC-area readers who may be interested, this Friday the Federalist Society and the Heritage Foundation are co-sponsoring a debate on Fisher v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:48 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Court also found by majority that even if s.12(1) applies, the court may not dispense with such service under rules 6.16 and 6.28 of the Civil Procedure Rules (“CPR”). [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:59 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) D, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 1485 (29 June 2010) Budimir & Anor, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 1486 (29 June 2010) Harvey, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 1317 (19 May 2010) Mortimer, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 1303 (25 May 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) JN (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 723 (29 June 2010) Fiddes v Channel Four Television Corporation… [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
 The claim form and particulars of claim are available on Lawtel [£] On Wednesday 3 May 2017 there is a 3 day trial in the case of Sooban v Badal. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 5:50 am
This is not a bankruptcy case, but it will be applicable in many large bankruptcy cases involving allegations of fraud by shareholders or investors.On January 15, 2008, the United States Supreme Court entered an important decision in Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 3:30 pm by Kent Scheidegger
The Criminal Justice Legal Foundation has filed an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 5:25 am by Public Employment Law Press
Source: Albany Time UnionIn its decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 85 U. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the  standard of proof required to support an administrative… [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the  standard of proof required to support an administrative… [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the  standard of proof required to support an administrative… [read post]