Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 6241 - 6260
of 13,843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2019, 3:59 am
At Reason (via How Appealing), Damon Root looks at the federal government’s cert petition in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 12:30 pm
The ruling finds in favor of labor and environmental groups, including the Natural Resources Defense Council, United Steelworkers and Sierra Club that fought the case against the California Chamber of Commerce. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:00 pm
To begin, the Ninth Circuit specifically concluded that the United States Supreme Court decision in NCAA v. [read post]
30 May 2022, 7:00 am
Following the United States Supreme Court’s seminal ruling in Brown v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
Donald 14-618Issue: (1) Whether the Michigan courts' decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 12:20 pm
United States and can be accessed here. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 12:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 7:57 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:27 am
The California Court of Appeal ruled in Seviour-Iloff v. [read post]
23 May 2020, 5:38 pm
From South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
9 May 2008, 1:00 am
Although self-described as an alternative assessment of the impact of recent Supreme Court punitive damage decisions, the article ultimately echoes the refrain advanced by, among others, members of the defense bar immediately following the United States Supreme Court's decision in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 11:04 am
City of Los Angeles, California 18-1257 Issues: (1) What test – in a case under Shaw v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 10:10 am
Here is the opinion in Desert Water Agency v. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 7:08 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 9:14 am
Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm
No surprise after United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 6:44 am
Cynthia Bridges, Secretary, Department of Revenue and Taxation.[10] In Zenith the California State Board of Equalization held that the fact that “section 265(a)(2) and its supporting regulatory scheme concern the allocation of interest expense between taxable and nontaxable activities” indicates that it applies to California’s expense attribution provisions even though Section 265 “by its terms, applies to tax exempt obligations and does not… [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:17 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 3:06 pm
” In Saffie v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 2:55 pm
Yet, out of the 89,476 jurisdictions in the United States, only about 12,000 (13.4%) are “covered” jurisdictions. [read post]
