Search for: "State v. Character"
Results 6241 - 6260
of 7,506
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2010, 3:52 am
In such circumstances, and against the backdrop of the law generally in this field being in a state of rapid flux at this time, the Court of Appeal in Greene might certainly be forgiven if, with the benefit of hindsight, it appears that it failed to apply Re S correctly. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 6:16 pm
In State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 4:05 am
A name clearing hearing available if adverse allegations are shared with another agency or administrator without the assurance of confidentialityVandine v Greece Cent. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:10 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 6:07 pm
The rules appear to be settled as a result of a recent decision of the Federal Court in State Farm v Privacy Commissioner of Canada, 2010 FC 736. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 2:03 am
According to the Court of Justice* while it is possible that, in any given part of the European Union, surnames have a more distinctive character than forenames, it is appropriate to take account of factors specific to the case and, in particular, to the fact that the surname concerned is unusual or, on the contrary, very common, which is likely to have an effect on that distinctive character. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:25 pm
(See, AAMA v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 11:45 am
Gruber v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 6:28 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 609(a)(1) provides that For the purpose of attacking the character for truthfulness of a witness, (1) evidence that a witness other than an accused has been convicted of a crime shall be admitted, subject to Rule... [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 5:03 pm
Furthermore, he has apparently franchised the NAKED COWBOY name to exhibitionists in other cities across the United States for about $5,000 per year (money well spent, I’m sure). [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:11 pm
Evans and Lawrence v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 12:53 pm
In fact, I wonder what John Adams would have made of a Supreme Court decision like Scott v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:22 pm
If and in so far as the answers to the foregoing questions mean that the trade mark is not being used within the meaning of Article 5(1) of Directive 89/104, are the Member States entitled, in relation to the use of [keywords] such as those at issue in this case, simply to grant protection – under Article 5(5) of that directive, in accordance with provisions in force in those States relating to the protection against the use of a sign other than for the purposes of… [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 11:17 am
The usual cast of supporting characters joined Scalia’s majority. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 6:30 am
The case is United States of America v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:49 am
Like its federal counterpart, Iowa Rule of Evidence 5.405(a) provides that In all cases in which evidence of character or a trait of character of a person is admissible, proof may be made by testimony as to reputation or by... [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:56 am
Malhame v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:47 am
Since July 5 is X-Day, this Blawg Review will reflect upon the Church of the SubGenius.TM If you are already celebrating X-Day, congratulations. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 10:57 am
* United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 3:30 am
Since July 5 is X-Day, this Blawg Review will reflect upon the Church of the SubGenius.TM If you are already celebrating X-Day, congratulations. [read post]
