Search for: "State v. Childs" Results 6241 - 6260 of 21,041
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2017, 2:18 am by Aimee Denholm
Arises out of the trial of nine men on charges involving organised child sex grooming and child prostitution in the Oxford area. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
This wrongly states that Impress made the damages award. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 8:05 pm
The Cassinelli Appellate Court then went on to renounce constructive /resulting trust as to other assets held by the (former) service member spouse as available remedies as well, reasoning that would violate federal law and the holding of Mansell v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 7:00 am by Jenny Gesley
Supreme Court held in Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:03 am by MATHEW PURCHASE, MATRIX
The Divisional Court had little difficulty in answering the case stated in the negative. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:58 am by jameswilson29@gmail.com
West, CH03-938, where a Virginia Circuit Court issued a letter opinion stating that the Court of Appeals’ mandate only reopened the case for the limited issue of adjusting child support payments. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:46 pm by John Floyd
  On June 27, 2017, the Fifth Circuit in  Brewer v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 6:22 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Supreme Court holds that the State of Missouri violated the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment in denying a church government money that would replace the gravel playground surface with a more child-friendly rubber surface. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 2:46 am by ASAD KHAN
Addressing the testing concept of “very compelling reasons”, Lord Wilson also replicated the Strasbourg jurisprudence on deportation by focusing on factors such as (i) the depth of the deportee’s integration into the host society (ii) the quality of family relationships (iii) the extent of endurance of family relationships after deportation (iv) the need to safeguard and promote the welfare of any child (v) the strength of the obstacles to the deportee’s… [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 2:46 am by ASAD KHAN
As demonstrated by Mamatkulov v Turkey (2005) 41 EHRR 25, DFAL’s criterion of serious irreversible harm shows some intersection with the ECtHR’s application of rule 39 relief. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 8:21 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In 2006, the Supreme Court of Canada held in S (DB) v G (SR) stated, 60 No child support analysis should ever lose sight of the fact that support is the right of the child… While this is trite law, the concept still comes up in unique circumstances such as with a disabled adult child who may have an entitlement to support under the Divorce Act, but would not under Ontario’s Family Law Act. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 6:50 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
This issue was resolved by the United States Supreme Court in 1979 in the noteworthy case of William Orr v. [read post]