Search for: "T. R. W. " Results 6241 - 6260 of 8,399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2012, 9:01 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
  “[W]e urge [you] to instead allow for a full and thorough review of their qualifications through regular order in the Senate,” wrote the Senate Republicans. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 3:06 pm by Woodruff Family Law Group
The trial court didn’t like the CPA’s classification for tax purposes and found that the low salary and high distribution were ways to avoid withholdings and FICA. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 6:31 am by John Hochfelder
Defendants argued that the entire past loss of earnings award should be set aside because plaintiff did not testify as to  his job duties, his hours and his wages except to the extent that he presented in evidence his W-2 statements for 2008. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:51 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Legal  History: The Davis in the Davis Polk law firm’s name refers to John W. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 11:30 am by Amy J. Traub and Laura Scully
’” Indeed, how time is measured matters, as the court explained: [I]t is not instantly clear from what date the alleged discrimination should be judged. [read post]
1 May 2014, 7:36 pm by David Oxenford
  The press release went on to say “[w]ithout this information, viewers are denied important information about the organizations and individuals seeking to influence their vote through these ads. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 2:03 pm
Shareholder Derivative Litigation, No. 1:05-cv-50710 "[W]hat is the date for the April grant going to be? [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 11:28 am by Kim Zetter
The Espionage Act, which dates to 1917, has never been successfully used against a media organization, but this doesn’t mean Assange is in the clear. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 11:26 am by Chris Borgen
It doesn’t just up and vanish off the face of the Earth. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 2:16 pm
  The court was not impressed, to say the least, with the lack of documentary support for key representations by the SLC that certain disputed benefits for the company executives were included in their W-2s. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 9:53 am
The court’s 5-2 decision overturned a 1999 ruling in which it found the opposite — that more prison time wasn’t enough to force an inmate to incriminate himself. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 4:57 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
.”  Indeed, the majority opinion ends with the conclusion that “[w]hatever may be said for [Sosa's] broad principle, it expresses an aspiration exceeding any binding customary rule with the specificity this Court requires.” If a norm had to be universally recognized in order to qualify as a “binding customary rule,” the brief’s “undisputed” standard would make sense. [read post]