Search for: "THE UNITED STATES et al"
Results 6241 - 6260
of 8,485
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2011, 9:57 am
SCOTT KAVALEK, et al., Defendants, Civil Action No. 08-2646-NLH, United States District Court, D. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 9:38 am
(LEA), John Carrington, et al., had failed to quash all of plaintiffs’ claims with their motion to dismiss. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 6:45 am
But, it’s worth remembering that the issue of where, legally speaking, the United States is at war with al Qaeda remains an open one, Hamdan notwithstanding. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:09 am
On February 14, 2011, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the District of Arizona’s ruling in Christopher, et al. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 8:36 pm
They have been raised and lived in a culture and country totally different from that which is enjoyed by people living in the United States. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:47 pm
(IP finance) United States US Patents – Decisions CAFC: In re Katz (part 2): Indefiniteness of computer processes (Patently-O) CAFC: Altair illustrates how to win by losing: Altair v Leddynamics (IPBiz) District Court E D Wisconsin: In Re Seagate does not dictate standard for pleading willful infringement claim: Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation, et. al. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:10 am
Attorney is available on the Internet at: http://www.scribd.com/doc/50454766/Kruger-Carl-et-al-Complaint. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 5:17 am
United States Department of Health and Human Services, et al. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 3:41 am
CHRISTOPHER SUGRUE, et al.,07 MDL 1902 (JSR)Applies To:08 Civ. 3065, 08 Civ. 3086; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; 2011 U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:13 pm
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of Louisiana et al. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 8:27 am
”); see also United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:42 am
The Walt Disney Company, et. al. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
United StatesDocket: 10-516Issue(s): Whether an essential element to be proven for a conviction for the offense of bribery of a state or local official under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 1:46 pm
GOODSON, et al. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 9:56 am
Children A, B, C, D, E, and F, et al., 589 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 1991), "this Court has long held that the power to appropriate state funds is legislative and is to be exercised only through duly enacted statutes. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:56 am
Finally, it chides both sets of attorneys for failing to cite the United States Supreme Court case of DASTAR CORP. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm
§ Petitioners’ reply § Amicus brief of Economists et al. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:16 am
Walker In Alameda Books et al. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 7:25 pm
If, as we are so often lectured by the Left, the criminal is the victim (of poor schooling, bad parents, brain lesions, twinkies, et al.) why should he be punished? [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 11:07 am
John Ashcroft et al. [read post]
