Search for: "Test Plaintiff" Results 6241 - 6260 of 21,970
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2018, 7:50 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
In support of their claim, the plaintiffs presented evidence showing that one of the plaintiffs tested positive for salmonella, that other wedding guests also tested positive for salmonella, that other guests began feeling ill around the same time as the plaintiffs, and that a total of 16-20 other guests reported eventually feeling ill. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 6:03 am by Eugene Volokh
The Sixth Circuit reaffirms this, including for sexual assault accusations, in a case against the University of Michigan; and the court also allows plaintiff to proceed with his claim that the process was biased against him because of his sex.From Friday's Doe v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 1:15 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Plaintiffs File New Litigation Challenging Revised Project on CEQA and “Spot Zoning” Grounds And The Trial Court Finds The SNAP Amendments Constitute A New Project Requiring New EIR The same plaintiffs that brought the prior litigation filed new writ petitions challenging the Revised Project approvals on grounds that the Addendum violated CEQA (which they argued required an EIR instead), and that City’s application of Subarea F only to the Superstore constituted… [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 8:35 am by Joy Waltemath
Supreme Court decision, if the plaintiff proves that the municipality caused the plaintiff’s injury. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 6:59 am by Steven Cohen
The defendant also argues that Smith does not employ a reliable methodology to support his opinions as he did not test any alternative designs. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 12:49 pm by Dean Freeman
The trial court, in vetting plaintiff’s expert witness, barred testimony pertaining to the alternative design theory she purported would have prevented or at least mitigated plaintiff’s injuries. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am by Joy Waltemath
The plaintiffs would get discovery, too; the government had “withheld nearly all information concerning this alleged deliberation. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 5:47 am by Woodrow Pollack
"  In response, defendant explained that its limited sales in a single test market, as well as its long standing trademark rights -- predating Plaintiff's trademark rights -- cautioned against the extraordinary remedy of an ex parte temporary restraining order. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 5:47 am by Woodrow Pollack
"  In response, defendant explained that its limited sales in a single test market, as well as its long standing trademark rights -- predating Plaintiff's trademark rights -- cautioned against the extraordinary remedy of an ex parte temporary restraining order. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 5:25 am by Charles Sartain
 We expect there will be plenty involving our true-false test subjects. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 12:37 pm by Jeff DeFrancisco
Under state law, the plaintiff has three years from the date of the injury to file a lawsuit against the at-fault party. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 11:34 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
  The District Court’s Analysis Plaintiff  Daniel Cotto, Jr. previously worked as a forklift driver for Defendant Ardagh Glass Packaging, Inc. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 9:38 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The court distinguishes other secondary liability scenarios noting in passing that the scenario here is different from Grokster and Amazon but it’s unclear whether an entirely different legal test applies. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 9:29 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
More Blog Posts: Court Finds that Car Dealership’s Insurance Policy Did Not Cover Customers on a Test-Drive, Maryland Car Accident Attorney Blog, published August 7, 2018. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 6:40 am by Joy Waltemath
Requiring employers to bear the costs of this testing would also discourage unnecessary and burdensome testing of persons with disabilities or impairments, and prevent employers from abusing their ability to require tests. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 9:09 am by Jay R. McDaniel, Esq.
” Minority Shareholder Oppression Claims Most states have adopted the reasonable expectations test as a guiding principal in disputes among the owners of a closely held corporation. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 3:27 am by SHG
While noting that it was not impossible for a single instance of conduct to be sufficient to meet the test, the “isolated incident” here failed to suffice, since the prior incidents were unknown to the City. [read post]