Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws"
Results 6241 - 6260
of 55,066
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2018, 9:26 am
Twitter in particular lends itself to a medium where people understand statements to include rhetoric and hyperbole. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 10:09 am
This may be especially relevant in family law cases where people, who would otherwise never think of defying a judge, do so, not so much due to their contempt for the court, but their contempt for their ex-spouses. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 7:00 pm
The report documents that in the first year after the Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 3:33 pm
Among the people who can testify are the victim, eyewitnesses, law enforcement personnel, medical doctors, forensics experts, and the defendant. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:01 pm
They are already compromising their supposed right to intrude into people’s privacy through the offices of the PCC. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:02 pm
In particular, the legislature was clearly reacting to an ordinance enacted in February by the city of Charlotte, which added “lesbian, gay and transgender” to the list of protected traits for antidiscrimination purposes and provided that transgender people can use public restrooms that correspond with their gender identity. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 12:42 am
Constitutions reflect the permanent will of the people, which trumps the temporary will of the people as expressed in ordinary statutes (if a court is forced to choose between these sources of law to decide a case).But nobody can plausibly claim that Iowans meant to ratify same-sex marriage when they approved a constitution including equal-protection language. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:56 pm
The criminal law recognises the possibility of pre-e [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
This has been clear since the Court declared in Brown v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:32 pm
OBG Ltd et al v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:18 pm
24 May 2007, 6:31 am
People v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
We stress that determining appropriate coverage of labour laws requires rational and pragmatic reasons for treating people differently which go beyond legislative classifications to the purposes of the specific law. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 9:46 am
He was a lone voice in the wilderness at the time, but his view is now, largely, the law, having been adopted for direct appeals in Griffith v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 4:10 am
Jackson v. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 10:18 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 4:52 pm
We cite the ever helpful Wikipedia: Apple v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:14 am
[Wall Street Journal] Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Abortion, Banking Law, Biglaw, Books, Chevron Corp. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 4:00 am
If many people find it convenient, enjoyable, or profitable to do things that hurt animals, those things are not legally cruel. [read post]
