Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges"
Results 6241 - 6260
of 16,270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2010, 8:00 pm
Below, Alexandra Lampert of Stanford Law School recaps Monday’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
COA Opinion: Courts must consider a minor defendant’s age when sentencing him to life without parole
16 Nov 2012, 2:32 pm
The United States Supreme Court held, in Miller v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:35 pm
The United States Supreme Court must be despairing of how many patent appeals are coming its way. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm
The United States Supreme Court must be despairing of how many patent appeals are coming its way. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 8:30 am
As Wikipedia explains, “The United States district courts are the general trial courts of the United States federal court system. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:34 am
At that point Easterbrook noted that the Ninth Circuit, quoting Washington v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 7:47 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 7:30 am
In Hively v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 11:17 am
United States Trustee, 484 F.3d 154 (2d Cir. 2007). [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 8:35 am
In his opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 11:07 am
S. 606 et seq.; United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:18 pm
Ninth Circuit The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals declared in U.S. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 9:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:40 am
In Mendez v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 7:26 am
A federal district court preliminarily enjoined Executive Order 13943 seeking to kick WeChat out of the United States. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 1:21 pm
The 9th Circuit affirmed in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
District Judge visiting from outside of the Ninth Circuit and joined in by a Senior Ninth Circuit Judge. [read post]
7 May 2015, 8:41 am
” Healy v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:24 pm
Today’s opinion in McDonald v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 1:12 pm
United States District Court Judge Virginia Kendall of the Eastern District of Illinois dismissed Peter’s claim under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim, finding that (i) the allegedly infringed elements of the plaintiff’s song were not protectable under copyright law, and (ii) an ordinary observer could not conclude that the plaintiff’s song and Kanye’s “Stronger” are substantially similar. [read post]
