Search for: "United States v. Gooding" Results 6241 - 6260 of 18,653
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2009, 8:59 pm
Erwin Griswold, Law and Lawyers in the United States, 65 (Cambridge, Harv. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:34 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
It would be contrary to the purpose of conferring immunity on diplomatic agents to interpret the words “any … commercial activity” as including activities incidental to the ordinary conduct of daily life of diplomats and their families in the receiving state, such as purchasing goods and services for personal use. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 2:11 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
  From the NY Times comes "Eminent Domain Fight Has a Canadian Twist," about a Canadian pipeline company's efforts to take land in the United States. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 11:33 am by Eugene Volokh
”It is debatable whether a false statement, standing alone, lacks any First Amendment protection, as discussed at length by the majority and dissenting opinions in United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:56 pm by Florian Mueller
In that case, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently reversed a decision by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in a medical device patent case and found that the defendant had a meritorious patent exhaustion defense. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:50 am by jonathanturley
For JDPI or similarly situated trademark holders to obtain a different outcome, they must seek relief before the United States Supreme Court or the United States Congress. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 1:06 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Under the Rule, entrepreneurs would be required to demonstrate that their entry to the United States would create a ‘significant public benefit’ to the United States, and that their proposed businesses would provide a ‘substantial’ and ‘demonstrated potential’ to create more jobs and business growth in the United States, and not merely to provide income to the entrepreneur and his or her family members. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:00 am by Kevin
United States, 542 F.3d 867, 877 (Fed.Cir. 2008), that it does not regard the decision in Bratsk as requiring the Commission to presume that producers of non-subject goods would have replaced the subject goods if the subject goods had been removed from the market. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 7:41 am
Umbro's Delaware-based subsidiary handled its business in the United States. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:18 am by Eric Goldman
” It cites a Maine state court case that never showed up in my Westlaw alerts,  Donaher, III v. [read post]